Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.73]) by air-dd07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD072-86354cc3e9c435a; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 04:09:40 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AE6D63800009C; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 04:09:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P9vce-0007Zr-3c for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:08:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P9vcd-0007Zi-N6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:08:07 +0100 Received: from smtp04.online.nl ([194.134.41.34]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9vcb-0003ez-36 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:08:07 +0100 Received: from smtp04.online.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp04.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB10AE0D8 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:07:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pa3fnytrqxpddu (s5593e077.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.147.224.119]) by smtp04.online.nl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:07:58 +0200 (CEST) From: To: Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:07:56 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <006b01cb72fe$23473540$4001a8c0@lark> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Online-Scanned: by Cloudmark authority (on smtp04.online.nl) X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60494cc3e9c25485 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Alan, So under british regulations I did a lot of illegal experiments in the past HI.I don't know how the dutch telecom office thinks about this but I have a feeling they just don't want to be bothered with this kind of experiments.If I had the room for decent antenna's I was already transmitting at 9 KHz! 73 Victor -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens Alan Melia Verzonden: zaterdag 23 oktober 2010 23:33 Aan: RSGB LF Gp Onderwerp: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today In theory, if you communicate, yes! They reserve the right to make the decision to approve, and laser comms are under their "regulation" Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 9:09 AM Subject: RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > So you need permission to switch on a light??? > > 73 > > Victor > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens Alan Melia > Verzonden: vrijdag 22 oktober 2010 22:14 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > No a good idea Jacek Ofcoms regulatory powers do not end at 9kHz. They have > powers over radiation at any frequency. > Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jacek Lipkowski" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM > Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > > > > > *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz > > > > i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz > > (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick > > by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? > > > > VY 73 > > > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > > > > > >