Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7B26838000141; Thu, 2 May 2013 17:00:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UY0Fv-0005Ml-Mq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 21:37:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UY0Fv-0005MU-7U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 21:37:31 +0100 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UY0Ft-00017B-CV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 21:37:30 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.16.87]) by mwinf5d34 with ME id X8d51l00G1siNWS038d5c7; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:37:08 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <44B614366C29404190E187344027EA53@malHP> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 21:37:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: "beacon bashing" Old RAF terminology : ) G.. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 54f9a9b24d9d5f31a632377c3b90b222 Subject: Re: LF: What is Beacon bashing? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01CE477D.30BC1640" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40835182d3f2259f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CE477D.30BC1640 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "beacon bashing"=20 Old RAF terminology : ) G.. No 62 OTU took over the Airborne Interception (AI) Training Flight from = No. 3 RS, consisting of 10 Ansons and an initial course of 24 pupils. = The unit's projected establishment was to be three squadrons, each with = 14 Ansons, 14 pilots and 14 observer-instructors. Each aircraft was = fitted out as a flying classroom with duplicate AI indicators so that = the instructor could monitor the pupil's interpretation of what was = being seen on the cathode ray tube, while a second pupil watched the = target's behaviour visually form the front seat as he listened to the = commentary over the intercom. When the time came to act as the target = aircraft, the pupils were expected to keep their pilot on track between = two radar beacons, a boring but useful exercise known as 'beacon = bashing' From: Markus Vester=20 Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 9:06 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: What is Beacon bashing? Dear LF, please excuse my lack of English proficiency, but what does the term = "beacon bashing" mean? Must be something like "assaulting beacons in = public", finger pointing at their operators, or repeatedly claiming they = are the root of all evil on the band...=20 But, who would ever do such a thing? Best 73, Markus From: mal hamilton=20 Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 7:27 PM To: rsgb=20 Subject: LF: QRT 137 Now QRT on 137 Khz. No CW QSO mode any more all Beacon bashing in = various modes. Back to HF QSO MODE All LF ANTENNAS now Removed de G3KEV ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CE477D.30BC1640 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"beacon bashing"
 
Old   RAF terminology  : = )
 
G..
 
 
No 62 OTU took over the Airborne Interception (AI) Training Flight = from No.=20 3 RS, consisting of 10 Ansons and an initial course of 24 pupils. The = unit's=20 projected establishment was to be three squadrons, each with 14 Ansons, = 14=20 pilots and 14 observer-instructors. Each aircraft was fitted out as a = flying=20 classroom with duplicate AI indicators so that the instructor could = monitor the=20 pupil's interpretation of what was being seen on the cathode ray tube, = while a=20 second pupil watched the target's behaviour visually form the front seat = as he=20 listened to the commentary over the intercom. When = the time=20 came to act as the target aircraft, the pupils were expected to keep = their pilot=20 on track between two radar beacons, a boring but useful exercise known = as=20 'beacon bashing'
 
 

From: Markus Vester
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 9:06 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: LF: What is Beacon bashing?

Dear LF,
 
please excuse my lack of English = proficiency, but=20 what does the term "beacon bashing" mean? Must be something like=20 "assaulting beacons in public", finger pointing at their operators, or=20 repeatedly claiming they are the root of all evil on the=20 band... 
 
But, who would ever do such a = thing?
 
Best 73,
Markus

Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 7:27 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: QRT 137

Now QRT on 137 Khz. No CW QSO mode any more all Beacon bashing in = various=20 modes. Back to HF QSO MODE
All LF ANTENNAS now Removed
 
 
de G3KEV
 
------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CE477D.30BC1640--