Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3EC0A38000083; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 09:28:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TAhXU-0006oc-Ge for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 14:27:04 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TAhXU-0006oT-4F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 14:27:04 +0100 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TAhXS-0000WH-KM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 14:27:03 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.9.118]) by mwinf5d62 with ME id x1T11j0022Yo5Yq031T1sc; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:27:01 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <504C8B28.6010206@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <504C8B28.6010206@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:27:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: '' I´d rather think twice before using the "whip" '' Yes that's a good idea , use a PA0RDT Mini Whip antenna :) G.. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_LF:_DK0SWF-_what=C2=B4s_the_probl?= =?UTF-8?Q?em?= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db405504c996e53ef X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none '' I´d rather think twice before using the "whip" '' Yes that's a good idea , use a PA0RDT Mini Whip antenna :) G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Dr. Wolf Ostwald" Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 1:27 PM To: Subject: LF: DK0SWF- what´s the problem > hi ! > Instead of looking at the installation from the experimenters view, i hear > someone crying and whining. All things go thru evolution and of course the > "know it alls" never make mistakes or are less than perfect ;-) . > The ex-SWR site has lots of room and an receiving array surely can be > next. The activating guys had to work hard to get access to the facility > and one should give them time to proceed. They should be granted support > instead words of criticism from an "rocking chair" position. I´d rather > think twice before using the "whip" > > that`s my two pence worth de wolf df2py >