Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 09D283800008D; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TDaN3-0004K1-Q4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:24:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TDaN3-0004Js-BR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:24:13 +0100 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TDaN1-00067f-Lg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:24:12 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.46.170]) by mwinf5d32 with ME id 0CQA1k00A3gJGga03CQAE9; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:24:10 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <50565D34.3070603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50565D34.3070603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:24:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, I find the s/n of the two longest paths , being similar , interesting as one is sea water and the other over land .. had assume the sea path would be many dB better ? unless there is still some form of masking on the TA path ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Subject: Re: LF: OP32 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4081505716ba398b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan, I find the s/n of the two longest paths , being similar , interesting as one is sea water and the other over land .. had assume the sea path would be many dB better ? unless there is still some form of masking on the TA path ? 73 -G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:13 AM To: Subject: LF: OP32 > LF, > > Thanks to the recent overnight monitoring stations. Here is my summary > for the last 2 days. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >