Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 44AB13800009B; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 18:53:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RhrgW-0002wj-Hd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:52:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RhrgV-0002wa-Tp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:52:55 +0000 Received: from nm4.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.235]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RhrgU-0003K6-GO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:52:55 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.231] by nm4.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jan 2012 23:52:48 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.227] by tm4.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jan 2012 23:52:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jan 2012 23:52:48 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 716170.48058.bm@omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53347 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2012 23:52:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=fEG9kCH8Tq2AQCsfOXtsrVazJm7E6eD4F1z3N/h+o7Zr7SsOsxMUQzARMeqdir5Lph1lYu5JYfML4giLWRUPPKQsBV9xtDLZOx97UhDhR1wn8jDPTG+PDAiKJjAbXy8Kvgp2QT8/Kbrx7BX8J5WcS+EZYjiZH96ySI0BK0Ysfb0= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1325548368; bh=O94ivNgbJsENptNrTYnOypyHijvWmP4rUtcaAcZwGSE=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=DOgr2lAat9th3AWDHn0qysCI+QWzLylYKByoSoIWroFw5T4/vu4eH4gAi4s+lxFq4XCnsP6SakfcTL5jUQ1l2WJ1sqbq8hR4lilDoH/kuj00jLAo6Ty8AQMgrCHAYH5k6g0B/524ovrdmHlhMVCzViC2fNAjtt5DNFDQxNNi8dc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: _fOkUjEVM1kPd59SxIryUwMguzxj_1bnraoIXklnRhP6_DE 8b5GDgfWxnxvWOZd8kJM11p1MyxvKlE42ZvdwcKTevV.3vXX4rH2mdbjBfkw zzAxUCINzqgRYfONxBR9bnsUcYhwZP1mi69jX.B9QXvdC0MT5iJ4iJo8YVRg wuR3LGj2CGxwORyZmJXjMws43q.PJ2hgdj92k8dvXLWHpaEf8fn5l_W4ooIi t7u2R9N5ziCnJQRLXMdyGeMJCCb.mSc0xmFqHorsN6I06zEknF.qJkpwH.35 tkfi5e7iQus6YzGL9IHaI_iInK_rE5mm2tnd6rMTJm6WwrZ9iS1GmjFJvVks _Y5zjDAKTIaWj5bR2iV25BOe1N5hpQMArO6lMSsWzdru3yKqaYVV_IRyOcfv 4V.gldCD.J8wAxR1QKA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.176.98.245 with login) by smtp829.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 02 Jan 2012 15:52:48 -0800 PST Message-ID: From: "James Moritz" To: References: <01a801ccc878$ef553030$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><4F005FF6.7020206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:53:05 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: LF ferrite RX antennas Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:342316896:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d257.2 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604d4f02437b21a6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear Doug, LF Group, >I wonder.....if someone were to make a large enough ferrite core antenna >(not for portable use), would it even need amplification? The cost and/or >size would probably be prohibitive. Some calculations and experiments were done a few months ago on this topic... The point of the experiments was to see if it were possible to make a portable ferrite rod antenna of 300mm length or less that would give reception limited only by the external noise, i.e. where on a quiet band, the band noise would still dominate the internal noise due to the rod antenna/preamp/RX. It turned out to be fairly easy to achieve this using appropriate preamp designs, and at that time both DK7FC and myself came up with satisfactory working antennas. My conclusion was that, although there is quite a bit of variation between ferrite rod antennas of different thickness, material, shape, windings etc, you can say that a ferrite rod antenna and an air-cored loop will yield very roughly the same signal level if the diameter of the loop is the same as the length of the rod. The signal output of a 300mm rod or loop antenna is very small, and a preamp is definitely needed for commercially available receivers, which have much too high a noise figure to use such an antenna directly. The output can be increased by scaling up the area of the loop, or length of the rod. Quite a few LF amateurs have made tuned loops a few metres in diameter that provide enough signal to drive a decent receiver directly. For portable use, a 300mm long rod antenna is certainly a more convenient thing to carry around than a 300mm diameter loop. No doubt you could scale up the rod antenna for fixed use, but a suitable chunk of ferrite a few metres long would be very expensive, very heavy, and not really have any advantage compared to the air-cored loop. I'm not sure if there is much practical advantage in eliminating the preamp, but if you wish to do so, a large air-cored loop is probably the most practical solution. KB4OER wrote: >Mal, you lost me on this one. Are you suggesting I (or we.....here in North >America) erect large verticals, inv L systems, >Rhombics, and V beams in >order to receive EU LF signals? >I thought I was doing pretty well with my micro RX antenna! I think everyone apart from G3KEV thinks so too! Don't take too much notice of Mal's opinions - however often he repeats them, they remain nonsense ;-) Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU