DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE;
  b=Lr410E7MNzitS17J8gFc8AiQfcboMT6WHnAP9/qUqyGI77ALvI2XdyNUYMVxXtt2c/+SMa/y6Ai7asf3UvD+Q9lC+lrQE3iA6cBAEnMDhAvM9zNVLpWThxAoWBVsmXYEg/a3NPggSQEun4F4fwaz/3vpf3EShmsM6yNUj5dpCQY=  ;
Message-ID: <B91ACF36CE0442F4B5C90F242F10B056@JimPC>
From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <d56.290b427d.374c1534@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <d56.290b427d.374c1534@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:12:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: G0MRF QRV
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org



Dear David, LF Group,

Thanks for the QSO on Sunday, and the details of the experiment.

> We started off with a reference antenna - A 9m vertical with a 5m top
> section ... the poor ground made it very inefficient, with 100 W from the
> transmitter generating an unimpressive 125mA of antenna current.

Assuming the transmitter was matched to the antenna and delivering the full 
100W, the resistive component of the antenna impedance to get 125mA works 
out to a remarkable 6400 ohms, which seems a little suspicious, and would 
require a very poor ground indeed! The lambda/4 top load giving antenna 
current of 1A at the same power amounts to a resistance of 100 ohms - a 
remarkable reduction, if the ground system was the same.

... I  expected the 'shortening
> effect' to be much greater. Perhaps this was a good  indication that as I
> suspected the 'ground' under the antenna was either a  considerable 
> distance
> from the surface or, operating from a hilltop had an  advantage

Or it could be that the effective ground was so close to the actual ground 
level that most of the antenna's fields were in the air, and only a minor 
shortening effect was present - the antenna might then be modelled as an 
open-circuit quarter wave transmission line stub, with the wire as one 
conductor and the ground as the other, rather lossy, conductor.

...our final plan to turn the whole thing into a
> single horizontal dipole mounted along the ridge of a hilltop had to be
> abandoned as one of the 2 fields suddenly acquired a large flock of 
> sheep.
>
...Reminds me of the Puckeridge Decca site, with the flock of sheep charging 
around in the dark and rain, for their own reasons!

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU