Return-Path: Received: from rly-md01.mx.aol.com (rly-md01.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.139]) by air-md10.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD103-8e649176436183; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:29:34 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md01.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD016-8e649176436183; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:29:12 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KzIlt-0001WK-4s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:28:41 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KzIls-0001WB-FX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:28:40 +0000 Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.co.uk ([193.252.22.156] helo=smtp3.freeserve.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KzIlq-0005GM-69 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:28:40 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3213.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 296397000085 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 23:28:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.16.176]) by mwinf3213.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id E69747000082 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 23:28:31 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20081109222831944.E69747000082@mwinf3213.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <49161DC9.20006@yahoo.com> <8bf118410811081522x24a17157l11024ef6f946c499@mail.gmail.com> <491620E3.3030309@yahoo.com> <20081108234449.127176ae@lurcher.twatt.local> <49162824.5000809@yahoo.com> <004201c94261$9ce2a5d0$6401a8c0@asus> <001701c94285$82edb5b0$6401a8c0@asus> <49172FA5.2030104@yahoo.com> <008401c942b3$ed142770$6401a8c0@asus> In-Reply-To: <008401c942b3$ed142770$6401a8c0@asus> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:14:41 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.5027.908 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.5027.908 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: G4WGT 500 KHz Grabber Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Gary, I find, using the page zoom on i-exp-8- that one display is ok as can open the picture out to + 400 % no problems (may be due to ie-8 ?) G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Gary - G4WGT" Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 9:41 PM To: Subject: RE: LF: G4WGT 500 KHz Grabber > > Hi Mike, LF, > > Well after a lot of hair tearing & cussing I have finally got 2 grabbers > running. > > Grabber1 is covering 500 to 504 KHz > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber1.html > > Grabber2 is covering 504 to 508 KHz > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html > > Give them a try & let me know. > > Gary - G4WGT. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Mike WE0H > Sent: 09 November 2008 18:45 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: G4WGT 500 KHz Grabber > > Hi Gary, > > That will work fine. Conditions were different last night. I noticed the > band got shorter as the night progressed. The guys over here will keep > trying. We will never know unless we try. Just like a HF band supposedly > being dead but when a contest starts up, the band has lots of DX... > > 73 > Mike > WE0H > /16 > > > > Gary - G4WGT wrote: >> Hi, Mike, LF, >> >> Earlier I wrote :- >> >> >>>> Tonight I will switch the grabber to the main 500 KHz tuned 12m >>>> vertical >>>> >> for >> >>>> overnight grabs, it should be better than the active antenna. >>>> >> >> Well I tested it out & found that with the SDR Lite the main antenna is > not >> as good as the active antenna (Mini-Whip). >> >> I have a balanced loop (G3LNP) which has been a good Rx antenna, I will > dig >> it out in the next few days & test it on the SDR for 500KHz TA reception. >> >> Meanwhile the grabber will retain the small split centred on 507.4KHz. >> >> Gary - G4WGT. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> Hi Mike, LF, >> >> I've got the grabber running again. >> >> Although it was not on line last night I have looked at the saved >> captures >> this morning but no signs of anything for your side. >> >> Tonight I will switch the grabber to the main 500 KHz tuned 12m vertical > for >> overnight grabs, it should be better than the active antenna. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Gary - G4WGT. >> > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.0/1778 - Release Date: 11/9/2008 > 14:14 >