Message-ID: <AEFE0DDA4EF84483B65F47610DE333D0@gmc.net>
From: Petr Maly <p.maly@gmc.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <BAY154-W8F810A2305494E42E258DD3600@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY154-W8F810A2305494E42E258DD3600@phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:32:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: LF: Band 472_479
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_027B_01CCF0A5.B3A55A10"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4094f439d06089e
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


------=_NextPart_000_027B_01CCF0A5.B3A55A10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all,

I am not so pesimistic, more exactly, I am a bit more lucky. I am abt =
212 km away from RP.=20
I made a first reception test this Sunday. RP is the strongest signal on =
the band but it doesn=E2=80=99t bother much. Besides it I heard two more =
beacons. The band is more spacy and much calmer than 136kHz. Looking =
forward to the day it is crowded by HAM sigs.

Listen to recordings at:
http://ok1fig.nagano.cz/Band630m.htm

73, Petr, OK1FIG


From: Lubos OK2BVG=20
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 17:26
To: _RSGB_LF=20
Subject: LF: Band 472_479

Hello OMs!=20
I read all your comments about new HAM band, they were written in the =
last days. To tell the truth, to use this band  will be a problem for me =
and all HAMS in our region. There is a Slovak NDB beacon "RP" located =
right between 472 and 479kHz.

CALL : RP
FREQ: 477kHz
Modulation:    +/- 1060Hz side bands
QTH: Malacky/Kuchyna=20
QRA: JN88NL  =20

My QTH is only 37km far from the "RP". The beacon=C2=B4s signal is =
constantly  at least +50dB up to noise (in fact +60dB in the modulation =
gaps). The carrier is not problem, but the worst thing is the wide =
strong noise during the transmission. It is about +25dB - see the =
picture. I made sure myself, that it was not a problem of my RX. The =
situation is the same, when an attenuator between antenna and RX is =
used.=20

I hope that "RP" will not be a problem for you as well!

73

Lubos, OK2BVG
------=_NextPart_000_027B_01CCF0A5.B3A55A10
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><HEAD>
<STYLE><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY dir=3Dltr class=3Dhmmessage>
<DIV dir=3Dltr>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>Hello all,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I am not so pesimistic, more exactly, I am a bit more lucky. I am =
abt 212=20
km away from RP. </DIV>
<DIV>I made a first reception test this Sunday. RP is the strongest =
signal on=20
the band but it doesn=E2=80=99t bother much. Besides it I heard two more =
beacons. The=20
band is more spacy and much calmer than 136kHz. Looking forward to the =
day it is=20
crowded by HAM sigs.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Listen to recordings at:</DIV>
<DIV><A title=3Dhttp://ok1fig.nagano.cz/Band630m.htm=20
href=3D"http://ok1fig.nagano.cz/Band630m.htm">http://ok1fig.nagano.cz/Ban=
d630m.htm</A></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>73, Petr, OK1FIG</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; =
COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: =
none">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style=3D"font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A =
title=3Dbvgbob@hotmail.com=20
href=3D"mailto:bvgbob@hotmail.com">Lubos OK2BVG</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, February 18, 2012 17:26</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Drsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">_RSGB_LF</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> LF: Band 472_479</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; =
COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: =
none">
<DIV dir=3Dltr>Hello OMs!=20
<DIV>I read all your comments about new HAM band, they were written in =
the last=20
days. To tell the truth, to use this band&nbsp; will be a problem for me =
and all=20
HAMS in our region. There is a Slovak NDB beacon "RP" located right =
between 472=20
and 479kHz.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>CALL : RP</DIV>
<DIV>FREQ: 477kHz</DIV>
<DIV>Modulation:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; +/- 1060Hz side bands</DIV>
<DIV>QTH: Malacky/Kuchyna </DIV>
<DIV>QRA: JN88NL&nbsp;&nbsp; </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>My QTH is only 37km far from the "RP". The beacon=C2=B4s signal is=20
constantly&nbsp; at least +50dB up to noise (in fact +60dB in the =
modulation=20
gaps). The carrier is not problem, but the worst thing is the wide =
strong noise=20
during the transmission. It is about +25dB - see the picture. I made =
sure=20
myself, that it was not a problem of my RX. The situation is the same, =
when an=20
attenuator between antenna and RX is used. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I hope that "RP" will not be a problem for you as well!</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>73</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Lubos, OK2BVG</DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_027B_01CCF0A5.B3A55A10--