Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EDA51380000B1; Fri, 25 May 2012 11:52:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXwnH-0005Kf-Um for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:51:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXwnH-0005KW-Gm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:51:11 +0100 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXwnF-0006ZK-Tq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:51:10 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiMFAJOpv09Ok8SA/2dsb2JhbABEgkUpCKFmkDR4EIIMBRNOLgoDBgF7JBsJhTgHgicamiygfI0xgjZgA4gMhS+XTYJh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,657,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="393930462" Received: from host-78-147-196-128.as13285.net (HELO malHP) ([78.147.196.128]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 25 May 2012 16:51:08 +0100 Message-ID: From: "mal hamilton" To: Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:50:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The current LF/MF reflector is doing fine, and I suggest LEAVE IT ALONE. For those that want to go elsewhere GO GO. I have not yet heard a good argument in favour of a move. In fact the one or two shouting loudest about Yahoo are seldom or NEVER heard/seen on any of the MF/LF frequencies. The arguments put forward by the majority of experienced operators to date to stay with the current reflector are constructive and sensible. I am active most days on 137 and 500 Khz mainly using CW and QRSS also active on HF and VHF i can always be contacted by private emails for skeds etc if ever this reflector packs in and will not be moving to YAHOO with all the politics, red tape and censorship and appliance operator rules [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.238 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: LF: LEAVE IT ALONE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01CD3A96.8E39A3E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:438318048:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40494fbfaac5451e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CD3A96.8E39A3E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The current LF/MF reflector is doing fine, and I suggest LEAVE IT ALONE. = For those that want to go elsewhere GO GO. I have not yet heard a good argument in favour of a move. In fact the = one or two shouting loudest about Yahoo are seldom or NEVER heard/seen = on any of the MF/LF frequencies. The arguments put forward by the majority of experienced operators to = date to stay with the current reflector are constructive and sensible.=20 I am active most days on 137 and 500 Khz mainly using CW and QRSS also = active on HF and VHF=20 i can always be contacted by private emails for skeds etc if ever this = reflector packs in and will not be moving to YAHOO with all the = politics, red tape and censorship and appliance operator rules de mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CD3A96.8E39A3E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The current LF/MF reflector is doing fine, and I suggest LEAVE IT = ALONE.=20 For those that want to go elsewhere GO GO.
I have not yet heard a good argument in favour of a move. In fact = the one=20 or two shouting loudest about Yahoo are seldom or NEVER heard/seen  = on any=20 of the MF/LF frequencies.
The arguments put forward by the majority of experienced operators = to date=20 to stay with the current reflector are constructive and sensible.
I am active most days on 137 and 500 Khz mainly using CW and QRSS = also=20 active on HF and VHF
i can always be contacted by private emails for skeds etc if ever = this=20 reflector packs in and will not be moving to YAHOO with all the = politics, red=20 tape and censorship and appliance operator rules
 
de mal/g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CD3A96.8E39A3E0--