Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.151]) by air-ma09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA093-b5364d21fb7a59; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:38:18 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CC24D380000FC; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:38:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PZnPO-0005ad-Eo for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:37:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PZnPN-0005aU-Fd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:37:21 +0000 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PZnPL-0006D5-L4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:37:21 +0000 Received: by iyj21 with SMTP id 21so12516601iyj.16 for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:37:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OIr7nTF98Jwfo6CEb/qkU4wHGm2mqCnCAHnHNvgU2Vk=; b=wgAxXWAASn8C+r6qyh53EXuExZEntErYY3c5G4ogw+3DdZZP8dxahtjuYV4VwS54xv /IClIXpdcOGM7xAdOjz41+4Wsc93QpJkRDO2ut+HQd/ewL3Y6EQxrkJ4zq4Sdw1PumGc cpXdaHX23aDvDJ/3wgtAdmekkQMxVHS6iXJaU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mVT28H5PMX3MVyOkCWPP+n7Q5xyeoL0Ks6V99gKoeR0RFdSgNtpm4HtRMh/GZ/HP/b akNwqliw0pGlDC0Shym0R3+zPd0YaZnCNN2rhFsxOfmMHy7PEIPmLUtyg/FQlEkWRq+E ymSCmQW5pYQgDaAsMMll7tsrx7pV2wcx2o7aU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.35.75 with SMTP id o11mr4539361ibd.12.1294072632683; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:37:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.200.211 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:37:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4E4CDEF5-8855-49E9-9F45-BB88C715B612@numeo.fr> References: <20110103144926.121420@gmx.net> <003501cbab58$13ed4660$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E4CDEF5-8855-49E9-9F45-BB88C715B612@numeo.fr> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 16:37:12 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325579db295acb90498f3c354 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d301.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40974d21fb7841ea X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --000325579db295acb90498f3c354 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Why will a proper Rx give better results than a soundcard? 'JNT On 3 January 2011 16:06, John Rabson wrote: > Not lazy, just an alternative engineering solution, and for some people a > more economical one. > > John F5VLF > > On 3 Jan 2011, at 16:08CET, mal hamilton wrote: > > > Guido > > A sound card is LMRX (Lazy Mans Receiver). A proper RX and good wire > antenna > > on LF will always give optimum results. > > > > g3kev > > > --000325579db295acb90498f3c354 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Why will a proper Rx give better results than a soundcard?
=A0
'JNT
=A0


=A0

--000325579db295acb90498f3c354--