Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mc08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.80]) by air-ma08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA082-b5314c2ced19a8; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:31:37 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mc08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 39F0F380000AF; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:31:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OUPSx-0003f5-9P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:30:31 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OUPSw-0003ew-QO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:30:30 +0100 Received: from mail-pv0-f171.google.com ([74.125.83.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OUPSv-0002P0-Mk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:30:30 +0100 Received: by pvg4 with SMTP id 4so1037394pvg.16 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:30:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=E+xNRAhJdCbPYTE2LbZiPh4asT0xOj4E1Imf4ZDOnVg=; b=mhCaheu/GEQLDsaHBIFfxS6D3KVK4Adw7Q8yhNw8WUEUc8AbL1w8Bb3KJO/WMTqjlY IrxvOpztoASqIZbeF2Uyo1SrVIysvP3xpOSvvIo/HOZM+tSFxwQvkunopiyCiW+wrf0C 2lgFBs9XjkNTbX6zbYLZaQZiOxfn1nAW3pzYw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pv7yhisUo1IHePvVOyZLAckIs3ZkAzWtavD4+eCsrsITPVcQHXeZ3CGm9yrJiARZdm hWWb3+TCnEq/B9oeZWA5xWWF2BabQVmyMo1L8eID/TljvUFYYUQI/4KxRZ7hycAiIh+D fTqf3/eqB+cBQAMzuNAc1/qaAwR45xEyvr93k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.65.19 with SMTP id s19mr12550193wak.203.1278012622726; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.46.2 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:30:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <006101cb194f$261481a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <003101cb194a$28495540$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <006101cb194f$261481a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:30:22 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YKw7cGw96lINUtIFsZsRWxMFjUk Message-ID: From: Gary - G4WGT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 137.5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64cae0665670a048a5880c1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m250.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60504c2ced1529e5 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016e64cae0665670a048a5880c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mal, Not instability of the equipment, my own error in not locking the dial & unfortunately touched it. OK, I take your point about others may be curious about what it looks like but I believe that I am transmitting well within the terms of my licence & recommended bandwidths. Oh & by the way, my ERP is only 50mW approx. Gary - G4WGT On 1 July 2010 19:56, mal hamilton wrote: > You are now jumping about in frequency, instability. > Others not familiar with this transmission might want to see what it looks > like and how much bandwidth it consumes. > g3kev > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Gary - G4WGT > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Sent:* Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:38 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: 137.5 > > Mal, > > Are there so many stations on the band that I am preventing someone else > operating ? > > I don't think 100Hz is uneconomical & I do know what it looks like. > > Gary - G4WGT. > > > > On 1 July 2010 19:20, mal hamilton wrote: > >> Not economical frequency use. >> see pic >> >> > > --0016e64cae0665670a048a5880c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mal,

Not instability of the equipment, my own error in= not locking the dial & unfortunately touched it.

=
OK, I take your point about others may be curious about what it looks= like but I believe that I am transmitting well within the terms of my lic= ence & recommended bandwidths. Oh & by the way, my ERP is only 50m= W approx.

Gary - G4WGT


On 1 July 2010 19:56, mal hamilton <= g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:
You are now jumping about in frequenc= y,=20 instability.
Others not familiar with this transmi= ssion might=20 want to see what it looks like and how much bandwidth it consumes.<= /div>
g3kev
=A0
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Gary -=20 G4WGT
Sent: Thur= sday, July 01, 2010 7:38=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 137.5

Mal,

Are there so many stations on the band that I am preventing someone= else=20 operating ?

I don't think 100Hz is uneconomical & I do know what it loo= ks=20 like.

Gary - G4WGT.



On 1 July 2010 19:20, mal hamilton <g3= kevmal@talktalk.net>=20 wrote:
Not economical frequency use.
see pic
=A0


--0016e64cae0665670a048a5880c1--