Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12692 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 17:43:46 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by netmail00.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 17:43:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 10478 invoked by uid 10001); 10 Sep 2003 17:43:43 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 17:39:25 -0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19x8ue-0003sd-Bz for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:37:52 +0100 Received: from [213.40.2.23] (helo=bodum.sout.netline.net.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19x8uR-0003rB-2h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:37:39 +0100 Received: from [213.40.207.45] (helo=taylormade01) by bodum.sout.netline.net.uk with smtp (Exim 4.04) id 19x8tv-0007ul-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:37:08 +0100 From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:38:33 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <000a01c376af$a1d74560$6507a8c0@Main> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: RE: re DCF39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,ORIGINAL_MESSAGEversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 1 Hi Alan and all at LF, Checked CFH last night after Alans comments, looked at captures this morning (Wed 10/09/2003)and CFH first seen at about 2300 utc (Tues night)good strength most of time, some sharp fading later and finally faded out at about 0625 utc this morning. I will try looking for WD2XDV beacon. Using G3LNP loop at 15 feet above ground and Yaesu FT747GX with Spectrum Lab, my location north west England. Regards Gary G4WGT -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Alan Melia Sent: 09 September 2003 09:52 To: LF-Group Subject: LF: re DCF39 Hi Steve, yes things are improving a little now, CFH was a good signal here last night but was a bit "peaky" with some sharp fades. Good levels were not present for as long as on your DCF39 plot. Thanks for the gen. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.514 / Virus Database: 312 - Release Date: 28/08/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.514 / Virus Database: 312 - Release Date: 28/08/2003