Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wB3JJMiW022290 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 20:19:23 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gTtfC-0005Ii-N5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 19:13:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gTtfB-0005IZ-3z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 19:13:49 +0000 Received: from proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net ([65.175.128.136]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gTtf9-000440-8O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 19:13:48 +0000 Received: from Rob64PC (d-69-161-84-15.cpe.metrocast.net [69.161.84.15]) by huckleberry.metrocast.net (8.14.7/8.14.4) with SMTP id wB3JDhj4000486 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:13:44 GMT Message-ID: From: "Rob Renoud" To: References: <0d2ac752-44f5-e503-e2a0-a8b4c841bcee@n1bug.com> <5C052984.8030902@posteo.de> <04207F3E-523E-40B8-A93C-E1AEBE0D3A4A@md.metrocast.net> <3c05b896-ecf2-8b93-b6e7-e618fa7263c3@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <3c05b896-ecf2-8b93-b6e7-e618fa7263c3@n1bug.com> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:13:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.21.6,1.0.8,0.0.0000 definitions=2018-12-03_10:2018-12-03,2018-12-03,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1810110000 definitions=main-1812030176 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Thanks for the info regarding your measurements. I believe you use a ScopeMatch in the shack to make your tuning adjustments and voltage/current measurements. I also run a ScopeMatch on LF and MF that uses a capacitor voltage divider and toroid curr [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [65.175.128.136 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. X-Scan-Signature: 1c38f63d01970a2bf149f660c9cb2a37 Subject: LF: Re: More on unstable antenna R Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, Thanks for the info regarding your measurements. I believe you use a ScopeMatch in the shack to make your tuning adjustments and voltage/current measurements. I also run a ScopeMatch on LF and MF that uses a capacitor voltage divider and toroid current sensor. I have found the ScopeMatch to be an excellent tool for visually tuning the matching coil to resonance and R=50 ohms as well as monitoring for changes during the operating period. I have found, however, that the SceopeMatch is not particularly accurate for determining actual SWR or input impedance (R and/or X) based on voltage and current measurements using that tool when compared to a know accurate VNA. Wonder if you might have access to an antenna analyzer or VNA to measure the changes that you are experiencing? Think that approach might be more useful in identifying where to look. Like you, I also have significant winter to summer changes in the antenna values that are handled by the tuner. I have not experienced any changes during the transmitting period, however, so am scratching my head with you.... Regards, Rob - K3RWR -----Original Message----- From: N1BUG Sent: Monday, December 03, 2018 5:54 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: More on unstable antenna R On 12/3/18 12:22 PM, N1BUG wrote: > At the time of the tests in question, R at the transmitter end of > the line varied from 58 ohms at the start of a transmission to 46 > ohms 2 minutes later. I calculated that from measured voltage and/or > current on a 50 ohm line with no reactance. Uh... not quite. Let's try that again! Measure voltage, measure current (I measured peak on the scope and converted to RMS) Calculate R = E/I I am assuming that works as long as X = 0. Voltage and current waveforms were exactly in phase for all measurements. Correct me if I have gone wrong here. I can always go wrong with math. 73, Paul