Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp391548igc; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:41:56 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.203.197 with SMTP id f45mr212023eeo.90.1392162116060; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:41:56 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v48si35113477eeo.62.2014.02.11.15.41.55 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:41:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WDMhg-0002wB-F0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:25:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WDMhf-0002w2-Vu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:25:23 +0000 Received: from omr-m04.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.78]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WDMhd-00065q-V8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:25:22 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mcd02.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mcd02.mx.aol.com [172.26.223.206]) by omr-m04.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 348D2700000B4 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:25:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (95-91-237-152-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.152]) by mtaout-mcd02.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id A518A38000094 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:25:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <52FA6028.90105@broadpark.no> <52FA60C8.8010009@broadpark.no> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FCE58C3@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <52FA813D.2070705@broadpark.no> <824FD7B5B55444A78C9C6D049732D1D7@White> <066601cf2774$7c856400$75902c00$@de> <8A8C13314F274FCB8A6E00763D70EDFE@White> <52FAAD1A.4070900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:25:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1392161119; bh=0Zr6kMMMVk0qrN9JjFWryW2EA/JXBB2iXlinKqr8P1c=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JoQQ8DbgJT792k2mNgM2KFM2p+0LAdDWOyC//D8QXb2WqHPgzS79IeSU57rXO0aTM 8VFhykP0dWrCVPVQP1INBPR7+vK1Sarp/Dr3pL7SKaY7aMHRQLhs01J0h5F988md5O m7ssO8E4Zj8TyRtLvCXpqnzzaxu3ES95XZeveTMQ= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1adfce52fab15e4093 X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.152 X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, Joe, best I got so far: ...cq cq c.she df2jp df2jp df\jp ar ... Just tried it: in varicode, sending DF6NM takes about twice as long as df6nm. [...] Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [64.12.143.78 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 3d5b8cd6516ff44ac46de53952029be0 Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01CF2788.E6A4F6C0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01CF2788.E6A4F6C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan, Joe,=20 best I got so far: ...cq cq c.she df2jp df2jp df\jp ar ... Just tried it: in varicode, sending DF6NM takes about twice as long as = df6nm. 73, Markus From: schaefer=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:07 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF That what i get here:=20 df2jp t t t j d|6nm pse k =7F=1Fkdfszdqpopcp b q t c e c|\i o ee\jo = df3jo bq k=1Fnujnrqf=1Fdf2jp df2jp de df6nm df6nm ur mm mm=20 73, Stefan Am 12.02.2014 00:00, schrieb Markus Vester:=20 Joe, ...sq cq cqqode df20r c9cjp d... ...qnrcq mvqee dds'jp df2jpyk f2jp ar... I may have picked up some of your call but it seems to be torn up by = statics (and perhaps DCF39). SNR peaked up to -25. Let's try a little = more... 73, Markus From: Joe=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:59 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: AW: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF Hi Markus, LF =20 First decode here but strong qsb =20 ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01CF2788.E6A4F6C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan, Joe,
 
best I got so far: ...cq cq c.she df2jp = df2jp df\jp=20 ar ...
 
Just tried it: in varicode, sending = DF6NM takes=20 about twice as long as df6nm.
 
73, Markus

From: schaefer
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for=20 LF/MF

That what i get here:

df2jp t t t j d|6nm pse k=20 =7F=1Fkdfszdqpopcp  b q t  c e c|\i o ee\jo df3jo bq =20 k=1Fnujnrqf=1Fdf2jp  df2jp  de df6nm df6nm ur mm mm =

73,=20 Stefan

Am 12.02.2014 00:00, schrieb Markus Vester:=20
Joe,
 
...sq cq cqqode df20r c9cjp = d...
...qnrcq mvqee dds'jp df2jpyk f2jp ar...
 
I may have picked up some of your call but = it seems=20 to be torn up by statics (and perhaps DCF39). SNR peaked up to -25. = Let's try=20 a little more...
 
73, Markus
 

From: Joe
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:59 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: AW: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for=20 LF/MF

Hi=20 Markus, LF

 

First=20 decode here but strong qsb

 

------=_NextPart_000_001F_01CF2788.E6A4F6C0--