Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp87258igb; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:43:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.72.226 with SMTP id g2mr2081027wiv.52.1378917801544; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ec2si5658530wic.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VJmnA-00059M-1e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:57:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VJmn9-00059D-Gv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:57:19 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VJmn7-0001rh-3r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:57:18 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.31.70.53]) by mwinf5d28 with ME id PrxC1m00D18xuR603rxD6k; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:57:16 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <522FF986.5010103@virginbroadband.com.au> In-Reply-To: <522FF986.5010103@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:57:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The short answer is 'No they have not' There is no interference in free space unless you transgress into partial physics and then the theories are held together with string , there is that experiment with 2 paths , did a wave do this or a particle ... interference patterns etc [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: Radio signals Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2709 The short answer is 'No they have not' There is no interference in free space unless you transgress into partial physics and then the theories are held together with string , there is that experiment with 2 paths , did a wave do this or a particle ... interference patterns etc to get a resolve , something has to be non linear , in this case the detector in the radio , and the recovered signal will be the vector sum of the two carriers / time and for a spectrum , then a reference is needed to recover the modulation , CIO , to give freq/amp/time , or a complex w/f / time for a detector alone G? -------------------------------------------------- From: "edgar" Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:03 AM To: <600m@yahoogroups.com>; Subject: LF: Radio signals > Hi Group, > > What is the mechanism for the way radio signals combine in the air? > > For example > > 1.There are two transmitters each sending out the same fixed frequency > sine wave signal. > > 2. There are no other signals in space, and no background noise. > > 3. There are no propagation factors modifying the signals. > > e.g. buildings, ionosphere layers. > > 4. Both transmitters are the same distance from the receiver. > > 5. Both signals have the same polarisation. > > How have the signals combined when they reach a receiving antenna at a > reasonable distance from both transmitters? > > It the process addition, multiplication or some other process? > > Regards, Edgar > Moonah, Tasmania. > > > > > >