Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w179trsQ022329 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 10:55:56 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ejMMB-0007Su-Se for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 09:49:35 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ejMMB-0007Sl-I5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 09:49:35 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-3.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.67]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ejMM8-0001SZ-NJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 09:49:34 +0000 Received: from mal ([2.98.121.32]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id jMM7eEUsDCbAZjMM7ejJ0L; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 09:49:31 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=talktalk.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=talktalk.net; s=cmr1711; t=1517996971; bh=s1hL8rM73iZoWwjoQowQsBzFbT+oNrN+miMKJt8Npwo=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=SxvnTYHU/u32iCOP0U6tqh+Hnrxr+GViZilGikzWbXwv6CJfHZmSqGrK+BvzwQapN GDZ/f8twDWgZQAa8EMY6EwVeIw+dwe/y7iIAmoTShQWLXU9WWU5a9gzWIAvICOBrco bmFVZIzeXEdRIvEo8vz9Sxrl9DTDM6s1zSMrA/TY= X-Originating-IP: [2.98.121.32] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=JvuBlIwC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=6/O84cueCPZQWFRE4vJs9g==:117 a=6/O84cueCPZQWFRE4vJs9g==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=GoqwstHNAAAA:8 a=J_-lhY7goEvNWxB7ktcA:9 a=TsgJuAu8ObM4o0Yb:21 a=02CNjs_r2LtwRlPs:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=slCku8JSH3TyizEDQ3pD:22 a=aif6eW07jeEVVZOP0pFm:22 Message-ID: From: To: References: <88b0ddac-08c5-5fab-9832-0917dc12fbe0@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <88b0ddac-08c5-5fab-9832-0917dc12fbe0@n1bug.com> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:49:32 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfM/4/kpqBoIGCjFb+e2w3RAiX3weNRxvSATTEf7r4i4em4IJsZPdJzVi+UYZTeA0zGhjKgeug+0pE42uWWm/UETttN7j51hvUB+Pbe6FhAO393mMjqrA KBXL5A0rWrhethVKx5esRwQCsxfCx3m/v1efnYnW+/wd6j6QODNHLlVR X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul Yes decodes in both directions but unfortunately no QSO. Another time maybe tonight If you saw me on your waterfall then QRSS would have worked ie QRSS 10 or less, possibly QRSS 3 Surprised other NA stns who decoded me did not call in or try. Sometimes when a signal is strong there can be more than one decode by other stations close by, often their RX is the problem and not the TX station I have noticed this around EU also and one station receiving a strong plus dB signal gets two decodes whereas another receiving the same strength signal only gets the strong signal decode, this would indicate that there are RX problems at some locations. If the TX signal is clean on the main frequency I would be inclined not to worry even if there is a second decode at -27dB say 100hz up from the main signal at +15 dB 73 and tnx for your efforts on MF de mal/g3kev/io94sh/Scarborough [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 64a43ebf6189d3fbac7adf77f3718769 Subject: Re: LF: MF: EU<>NA tonight Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul Yes decodes in both directions but unfortunately no QSO. Another time maybe tonight If you saw me on your waterfall then QRSS would have worked ie QRSS 10 or less, possibly QRSS 3 Surprised other NA stns who decoded me did not call in or try. Sometimes when a signal is strong there can be more than one decode by other stations close by, often their RX is the problem and not the TX station I have noticed this around EU also and one station receiving a strong plus dB signal gets two decodes whereas another receiving the same strength signal only gets the strong signal decode, this would indicate that there are RX problems at some locations. If the TX signal is clean on the main frequency I would be inclined not to worry even if there is a second decode at -27dB say 100hz up from the main signal at +15 dB 73 and tnx for your efforts on MF de mal/g3kev/io94sh/Scarborough -----Original Message----- From: N1BUG Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 2:44 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk Subject: LF: MF: EU<>NA tonight Getting closer but still no QSO ! I decoded PA0A calling me several periods but he did not respond to me sending reports. I decoded G3KEV calling me just once but saw him on the waterfall for several periods. Then I got a report of bad spurs on my signal (only 23 dB down) with a screen shot to prove it. It looked very bad so I stopped transmitting. Shortly after that I decoded a CQ from G3KEV at -25. G3KEV was decoded by other North American stations also. PSK Reporter and me do not get along well, I find it nearly impossible to figure out what it's trying to tell me. Usually I just end up grinding my teeth and growling at it ! However I believe my JT9 signals were heard by several other stations in EU. Subsequently I did some testing regarding the report of spurs. They appear to be more than 50 dB down in my own receiver. However I do not trust local measurements as overloaded receivers can do strange things. I ran WSPR for a while with the exact same setup I use on JT9. I received reports up to +15 but not a single double decode. So it remains a mystery what happened earlier when I had the bad report. As far as I can tell I am clean. Anyone up for another night of JT9 or perhaps QRSS? I have never used QRSS but am willing to try that mode. 73, Paul N1BUG FN55mf