Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAFEqjXE018027 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:52:51 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gNIud-00065N-8I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:46:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gNIuY-00065E-WC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:46:27 +0000 Received: from resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gNIuX-0000sL-1z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:46:25 +0000 Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id NHkDgEhzHymujNIuSg4Lgt; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:46:20 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1542293180; bh=13GF2tl0Rwzo/WDoScQIIzf4T/6TMMsW3j6U/Be9mY4=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=jdps5dKr+PAG2NjhTYnE1lA2CDLjzS8awWAupyp9XWxFgIPaDrVYkQKDW1LCqCE2y tJSV/N3cue7NsYMIW7YvG3/U4ryYhsN0KVMY0xusiJXtSz7yAGIVBzl8+SZOCUQHjD kq8ppB9lAacCEvQ5U3N6QIG2qaOYs4DvuxDoHRoCELlLT0UfDaAkkSyEtmw/pd8cIn ufMSbio2S1H//P+U8UMa3vYsuvNbkh2icYNw7NFpJ8m9tujmwNN2PhXR3TRWfbs9vM 4iVVxGFSUkhtyhALCROps0UGtAKQnDVWYi3fxixZs1f0kPOO1cGURfz0ci/gcacrW2 R6yZmWdG/z/SA== Received: from DELL4 ([73.4.253.141]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id NIuRgvd0fsSYsNIuRgnIsM; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:46:20 +0000 Message-ID: From: To: References: <716d3b03-599b-5373-c3e3-05d22ef853c2@n1bug.com> <1542213555.190626292@f509.i.mail.ru> <5BEC5252.8060708@posteo.de> <5BEC6C6D.8060109@posteo.de> <1UQdqZGgl0.CEOqs2b4XcB@optiplex980-pc> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:46:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfG1Sr45m8Ve7hyGCDitm431rSX6BZ4Uz0z1YsuUdonYee21YgHtfm+bxMQgqWEaBWC20GX+ngsT8RGYWlthcXPpR0JY35ERAQGWHPYEEm6ZHOS5MXFxo 8GTl74/pGqThPA8sEGUPdZErQnsE+Qubb+rrAe9hw/P5ybQ7jj1eWmIS X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Alan Thanks for the update on Brian. Next time you talk with him please say hello for me. He had quite an impressive signal on LF ... especially remember those mid to late afternoon captures. Think you spe [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:41 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Alan Thanks for the update on Brian. Next time you talk with him please say hello for me. He had quite an impressive signal on LF ... especially remember those mid to late afternoon captures. Think you speculated at the time that it might have been single hop. Jay W1VD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" To: Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 7:22 AM Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite > Hi Jay, Brian sold up the family home and plot in Porto (I think there was a fair bit of land) I > think for development and moved out with his wife to Affife about 50km north of Porto near the > coast. He started to reinstal aerials and had a solid outbuilding (shack/workshop build by local > labout) and did some interesting measurements of his take off angle (sandy soil) but never got the > enthusiam back for LF. I get an occasional phone call from him but the last was a year or so back. > He had become deeply involved in building a Solar PV system with battery storage. > > You can't keep a good engineer down:-)) > > Alan > G3NYK > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 11:28 AM > Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite > > > Paul > > Keep an eye open for late afternoon TA LF receptions. I recall CT1DRP (whatever happened to > Brian?) reception on DFCW as early as 2030Z on many ocassions. Quite often his signal would appear > around that time for an hour or so, fade out, then make a comeback later in the evening. > > Jay W1VD > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: N1BUG > Reply-To: > To: > Sent: 11/15/2018 6:09:21 AM > Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite > ________________________________________________________________________________ > > Hi Stefan, LF > > QSB was a factor last night. Isn't it always? I never had full > sequential call sign from DK7FC (missing only one 'dit') but I > consider the attached capture to be a full call sign copy. > Everything is clearly there, even if not sequential. Stefan, thanks > for the DFCW90 transmission! It is a pleasure to see this. > > Today after some snow removal tasks I will work on optimizations to > the first of several SpecLab grabber instances (thanks Stefan). > > Yesterday I had a successful full power test transmitting DFCW60. > Soon I will make an overnight appearance on DFCW. I don't know which > night(s) yet but I will announce it here. > > 73, > Paul > > > > On 11/14/18 1:41 PM, DK7FC wrote: >> All right Paul. >> >> And i should move to 136.172 kHz again soon, my home-frequency of the >> old days ;-) The US stns usually transmitted arround 137.775...137.782 >> kHz. So we 'far away' from each other inside the band. A few grabbers >> are watching that small region since years, without much activity in the >> last time. We splitted over to many bands and modes. >> >> Good luck for your transmissions. >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> Am 14.11.2018 18:00, schrieb N1BUG: >>> Hi Stefan, >>> >>> Very good! I just moved the 'roaming grabber' back to your >>> frequency. There is QRM now because I am testing my own station on >>> DFCW at full power, but I will stop my transmitter before sunset. >>> >>> 73, >>> Paul >>> >>> On 11/14/18 11:50 AM, DK7FC wrote: >>> >>>> Hi LF, >>>> >>>> Tonite, there will be *DFCW-90* from my side. I'll stay at *137.620 Hz*. >>>> Unusual, but you know, i'm currently bound to that frequency. >>>> >>>> Starting at arround 21 UTC. Timing is not critical, which is unusual >>>> too, these days :-) >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan > >