Return-Path: Received: from rly-de11.mx.aol.com (rly-de11.mail.aol.com [172.19.170.147]) by air-de07.mail.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILINDE074-51348ade66c373; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:04:59 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-de11.mx.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDE114-51348ade66c373; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:04:30 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KWIG8-0006C4-7R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:04:00 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KWIG7-0006Bv-Pm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:03:59 +0100 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.159]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KWIG4-0002Gl-40 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:03:59 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3414.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3FA501C00086 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:03:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.61.102]) by mwinf3414.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id E7A4C1C00084 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:03:45 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20080821220345948.E7A4C1C00084@mwinf3414.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <281222.921.qm@web26004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <001301c901e6$917c2d30$2201a8c0@PC2> <731EB49F88B309428FFDDD2423F810E441C128@HERMES4.ds.leeds.ac.uk> <48AADCE5.7070602@virgin.net> <034D836CD37D497C80547813F78DE240@AGB> <48AB191F.2070100@w1tag.com> <2BD00AC139914C138F0FB6FE5FB00F4D@AGB> <48AD575F.3010204@w1tag.com> <1ED6E58E4A6A4E8E801AF303F0C61DE9@AGB> <48ADD53E.80000@w1tag.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:03:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 X-Karma: -140: lashback.ubl=-140.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Keyboard Modes for 600 Meters Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: domain : post.thorcom.com ; SPF_helo = n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: domain : g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk ; SPF_822_from = n Interesting , John, I don't think I got round to running those two, they are coded in multipsk , but from experience 'wide' systems didn't appear to travel very well on 500 . The systems that I listed are simple on/off change state , which could be modulated by simple carrier frequency switching , Everything this end was/is linear in the traditional sense , cheating a bit with the Racal MA1723 and a 25 watt class -A- 24vdc driver amp for most of the year and later, a lucky find on e-bay a Skanti 250 watt o/p pa module from a hf/mf 8000 series marine transmitter .. G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "John Andrews" Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 9:51 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Keyboard Modes for 600 Meters > > Graham, > > Again, with the dangers of replying from work... > > You should be able to run MFSK 8 or 16 through your grinder...those are > single-tone-at-a-time systems, and have very nice FEC for this sort of > work. > > John A. > > Graham wrote: >> Ok John, >> >> I spent a while last year looking for modes that would go through these >> 'Meat grinder' transmission systems , only found , RTTY , Amtor arq/fec, >> Pactor arq/fec and Hf Packet , 'hell' of course , but thats in a gray >> zone .... I think the original Jason system will but with the advent of >> 'Bill's joined up writing, windows 'xp' it looks to of fallen over ..My >> version crashes on rx/tx change over . I think it made sequential >> frequency change steps, which where measured by rx software and thus >> determined the character .... which on 500 would be a good system, with >> no lock up time and presumably would print correctly to the point of >> loosing the last set of tones ?... >> >> Graham .. >> >> Ps (Alberto, any chance of a recompiled 'xp' version ? ) >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "John Andrews" >> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 12:54 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: LF: Keyboard Modes for 600 Meters >> >>> >>> Graham, >>> >>>> I think you will find , olivia runs more than one tone at any one time >>>> and produces a 'two tone test' envelope , simple check, view the sound >>>> card o/p on a scope ? >>> >>> (Belated reply...) Yes, you are correct about Olivia -- easily confirmed >>> with a scope in a short on-air test. This once again teaches me not to >>> make quick observations while at work! >>> >>> John W1TAG >>> >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: >>> 270.6.6/1623 - Release Date: 8/20/2008 08:12 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: > 270.6.6/1625 - Release Date: 8/21/2008 06:04 > > >