Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 24A6838000088; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:31:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UEpgv-0004Hn-Os for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:30:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UEpgv-0004He-7y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:30:09 +0000 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UEpgt-0001XF-F5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:30:08 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.14.235]) by mwinf5d61 with ME id 9zVk1l00t54HG5N03zVlpg; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:29:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <513C6CEE.2070504@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <513C6CEE.2070504@broadpark.no> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:29:44 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: CHARLIE CHAPLIN had the same problem VERY FUNNY [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: Re: LF: Jose soft Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b89513d17d94842 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none CHARLIE CHAPLIN had the same problem VERY FUNNY And banned in the USA G..)) Ps Log fire out then ? -------------------------------------------------- From: "Steinar Aanesland" Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:22 AM To: ; Subject: LF: Jose soft > > Quoted from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/43906 > > "The final straw for me was when I was showed the undocumented password > used to lock Cuban operators or really to allow them use of the Ros > application. This password was recovered through reverse engineering. > > Taking in to account Jose Ros behavior of the past, I decided that his > code was > untrustworthy. Untrustworthy from the perspective of allow it to control a > transmitter. This was a critical concern to me." > > Perhaps something to think about when you are playing with Jose's ROS or > OPERA? > > -- > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:JO59jq > > >