Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0FB6F38000126; Fri, 3 May 2013 04:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UYBkv-0007uK-0H for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 09:54:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UYBku-0007uB-FS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 09:54:16 +0100 Received: from nm6-vm8.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.99.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UYBks-0002jF-3f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 09:54:15 +0100 Received: from [212.82.98.44] by nm6.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 08:53:52 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.170] by tm5.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 08:53:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 08:53:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1367571232; bh=MryK1XoBBcpJ4ITilL4XhlydbDpBU7mR/FbLsiiIuwg=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index; b=fo0peJrH2eXkKZgzbUlYxNP1HAw4Sam1vyM86wpVDjkEy125c/1/DuS/MZpZFhVmfhSM9EFMC+0LI1IG25EWdg63Uupf0i3LNYL2mQi489d5Vf8wYFBkLb99OLDkKo/SBwzZtbq1R3IkWXLk+JMWdyTvvk4AmHV6g9kpfIjmhcs= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 859615.6703.bm@smtp111.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 66vPs5IVM1l_y7qy2fqaQWnTu7iFxGVGny1pf1OYiCEPgOl QiQJaftApz61PnxQwPoKwUNHnquQu..SEqtuXtZehiROfu9CbiHPC4XOhTgS LwxAktJKxb2EbFs.wUozRhilJWgeLGF6TMrnGLj5DoaLDZ3WXn3Q4SyvM0w2 OS2c_PRkB5FFdyar3NboqlD4Z_9KxWemNfmZayiY5GMo1cZLeLlzDk5GrPq. I97MDQhkJadJWgLwu6p8QMJ9p59P8sjzULaNdT0r55d4MVgB9V0.90ZW3_.M VakAkeUiUL8ZKt37Gvhxrrq4WkH7rBCjilDeV8Wmccrb.Dm_ifnSV_xcfT8g AOK2h_Sykmb6Q1OepaiK9RO5z0zhvYQA9f59CzpDaiHfdGVG8bvpsMlpPP_y SVgRgR6BzUXtPfW8Q4cw.Nu7C9r6yekj6fWOAPqC1qkOBCh2crFY9MMgzsZt PZJeq6EuPNs7so37R7A-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 9Y6mUHuswBAgnrOsukIiNdFDf95uy_Dz34nY1hlg2liKgYD952sjbg-- X-Rocket-Received: from lindavideo (ken.h.wright@86.151.96.9 with login) by smtp111.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 May 2013 08:53:52 +0000 UTC From: "Ken" To: References: <776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D4DE39E288@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 09:53:50 +0100 Message-ID: <9FC501904D1A4D80912C562B02611000@lindavideo> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 In-Reply-To: <776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D4DE39E288@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> Thread-Index: Ac5HftgHjsEI7uLCS2umIRXKPpUvQwASpORwAARopBA= X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I used mine 2 weeks ago. 73s Ken [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.99.237 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ce481d129b1a7277ee248e941d6e5100 Subject: LF: RE: RE: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0015_01CE47E4.1DA262A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mb02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601651837b8e3767 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CE47E4.1DA262A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I used mine 2 weeks ago. 73s Ken M0KHW _____ From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of REEVES Paul Sent: 03 May 2013 07:50 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS Hasn't anyone still got their copy of the TI 'TTL Data Book'? Absolutely the bible on such things back in the 70s/80s - I've still got mine (plus supplements) - and in hardback too! TI knew how engineers mistreat their books... Still need it due to boxes of 'spare' TTL waiting for a project. Of course, everyone uses FPGAs now :-( 73's Paul G8GJA From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Graham Sent: 02 May 2013 22:46 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS divider chip What is the difference anyone ?? Tnx -G. ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CE47E4.1DA262A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I used mine 2 weeks = ago.

 

73s

 Ken

 

M0KHW

 

From: = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of REEVES = Paul
Sent: 03 May 2013 = 07:50
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: RE: 74LS196N = 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS

 

Hasn't = anyone still got their copy of the TI  'TTL Data Book'?  Absolutely the = bible on such things back in the 70s/80s - I've still got mine (plus supplements) = - and in hardback too! TI knew how engineers mistreat their = books…….   Still need it due to boxes of 'spare' TTL waiting for a project. Of = course, everyone uses FPGAs now :-(

 <= /o:p>

73's

Paul &n= bsp;    G8GJA

 <= /o:p>

From: = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Graham
Sent: 02 May 2013 = 22:46
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: 74LS196N = 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS

 

74LS196N    74S196N  Difference  ?? L or  LS     = divider   chip

 

What is the  = difference  anyone  ??

 

 

 

Tnx -G.

 

  

------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CE47E4.1DA262A0--