Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp15014igc; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 13:07:34 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.84.144 with SMTP id z16mr25199700wjy.23.1394312853885; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 13:07:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id eo11si4599365wjd.21.2014.03.08.13.07.33 for ; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 13:07:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WMO4k-0007dK-AQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:42:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WMO4j-0007d8-Tp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:42:29 +0000 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WMO4i-0006yI-Am for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:42:28 +0000 Received: from AGB ([95.145.213.80]) by mwinf5d33 with ME id b8iT1n00B1keauP038iTvu; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:42:27 +0100 Message-ID: <9DC987C5FD31418283BBFF69F36B031F@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <2662DF5AA7FA416CBB09CDB90BBFF7B1@White> <016101cf39df$4f4c89a0$ede59ce0$@comcast.net> <01dc01cf3a3f$86997bb0$93cc7310$@comcast.net> <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <025101cf3a52$e0925750$a1b705f0$@comcast.net> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <531A506E.9040103@abelian.org> <531A5C19.9060209@abelian.org> <02ba01cf3aa3$debaad50$9c3007f0$@comcast.net> <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White> <531B1D0C.3070208@abelian.org> <531B2478.70500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <531B796A.9000906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <531B7E7E.3070801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <531B7E7E.3070801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 20:42:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I think that may be a tall order , the processing of the data etc will take some power one of the cheap usb donglels , in direct sample , will give access to vlf .. but that still needs the usb-wifi link .and a pr-amp ... only other way is a conventional radio mic ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b Subject: Re: LF: Microphone via WLAN (WiFi) ? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false I think that may be a tall order , the processing of the data etc will take some power one of the cheap usb donglels , in direct sample , will give access to vlf .. but that still needs the usb-wifi link .and a pr-amp ... only other way is a conventional radio mic ? -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 8:33 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Microphone via WLAN (WiFi) ? > Hi G, > > Am 08.03.2014 21:21, schrieb Graham: >> Surely the dynamic range is defined by the a/d in the sound card >> ...... ? the wi-fi link should only mimic the USb link ? >> its only in compression modes that all sorts of adjacent tones >> and dynamic range are limited ? a wave file is raw data ? > Uuh, these questions are already part of what i don't know :-) > All i want is to run a LF/MF/VLF receiver in a remote location, using a > 2.4 GHz link, having a power consumption as low as possible (less than 10 > mA at 5 VDC), a compact system. > >> PC in the link ....... dont know , but if the wi-fi simply >> extended the USB distance , then , would not the driver be at the >> end of the link ? as in the post ? > Yes, i think so. > > I think it is possible to get all these informations in the web and to > learn how it can be done. But that is to far away from amateur radio for > me. I just want to use it for LF/MF/VLF amateur radio :-) > > 73, Stefan >