Message-ID: <9A7D6A846ABF40A382393A2FF50DF994@White>
From: "Markus Vester" <markusvester@aol.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <54EE1D9A.5000504@gmail.com> <54EE306F.30108@abelian.org> <54F1A71B.5080005@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:40:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: LF: Todays monitor size
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01D05353.B8709000"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format.

------=_NextPart_000_0016_01D05353.B8709000
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stefan,

for me, rather not ... I'm mostly using a netbook which has a 1024 x 600 =
screen. The latest and often most interesting part of the spectrogram is =
usually on the right hand side.

73 Markus (DF6NM)


From: DK7FC=20
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:31 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
Subject: LF: Todays monitor size


Hi all,

A few years ago we had the discussion about ideal size for grabber=20
/spectrogram dimensions. The consensus was 1024 pixels horizontal.

Would you (all) still vote for that size?

Since > 5 years i'm now using a 22'' monitor with a resolution of=20
1680x1050 pixels. Of yourse it would be much better to have wider=20
images, covering a longer time...

I would tend to increase the size to 1600 pixels on at least a few=20
grabber windows.

Opinions please.

73, Stefan


------=_NextPart_000_0016_01D05353.B8709000
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588"></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: =
15px"=20
id=3DMailContainerBody leftMargin=3D0 topMargin=3D0 bgColor=3D#ffffff=20
CanvasTabStop=3D"true" name=3D"Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Stefan,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>for me, rather not ... </FONT><FONT =
size=3D2=20
face=3DArial>I'm mos</FONT><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>tly using a =
netbook which has a=20
1024 x 600 screen.&nbsp;The latest and often most interesting part of =
the=20
spectrogram is usually on the right hand side.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>73 Markus (DF6NM)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT><FONT face=3DArial></FONT><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style=3D"font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A =
title=3D73dk7fc@googlemail.com=20
href=3D"mailto:73dk7fc@googlemail.com">DK7FC</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:31 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Drsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> LF: Todays monitor size</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Hi all,<BR><BR>A few years ago we had the discussion =
about ideal=20
size for grabber <BR>/spectrogram dimensions. The consensus was 1024 =
pixels=20
horizontal.<BR><BR>Would you (all) still vote for that =
size?<BR><BR>Since &gt; 5=20
years i'm now using a 22'' monitor with a resolution of <BR>1680x1050 =
pixels. Of=20
yourse it would be much better to have wider <BR>images, covering a =
longer=20
time...<BR><BR>I would tend to increase the size to 1600 pixels on at =
least a=20
few <BR>grabber windows.<BR><BR>Opinions please.<BR><BR>73,=20
Stefan<BR><BR></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0016_01D05353.B8709000--