Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 389B438000085; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TDubp-0006jD-2Y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:00:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TDubo-0006j4-En for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:00:48 +0100 Received: from web100010.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp ([114.111.98.184]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TDubk-0002Mz-No for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:00:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 78296 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Sep 2012 10:00:34 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.jp Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.jp; s=yj20110701; t=1347962433; bh=mEuimJ6yWRwq5kopxBjRjhiUyPuw9LS20lOA7/cAQbQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=exI/g53Z4FadKCbnmvY4/BRDwOoqicIF5xTZe6Wolm/n05AsvILVpKumUYA71WXocQ5+e3gYH/Xkqk/qviXeFyVC8Iv1RrhpfmZmIs6kbbNGo6pm8N4UulkCHIoVUVASaJOxpWO93QB5s2nbKt0gmOaUFzKag977wzZoRAts7DM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fVUGIPMz8M+rkKkS6gvuFfGu43P/9P2H/svXbOv75zuFVzD0Te9jBvBaFPJapR3QJu3vUfmjZR3YcXDV1Ls/abgRiOpvjPOMABw6CaPxnMIAuZEgZ6obwpk8scJjpGRPLq/VJaD47eczA0rvPqyDaodjRuaXRJFdCgJxri5xyjY=; Message-ID: <960285.69695.qm@web100010.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> X-YMail-OSG: 0lvvsIkVM1mQANUJsa1YfIhup1cubICfhNKIwh_XMEVJsRtz_z1hpDc_CevwEYebksoQ0oFzUBVN5HTWDeXl_X3aqT2HeNTYFd4mTnYuu0Y.QI4k2jim..XNK88XFYrh51jdIC24_iVuiLshyzfkYO0QKD_vRbVHXlr_8WocV5puQpmY0QmmgfU1_30hlnPsM8DpDe5AfLhoXCluOvkCCg2TpiIuvDf_gBTPnkT3EKZwN3853Efyx1XuzUDa3qjH8rAlNsk_tuqtyQvIYeLdoEhA9YIs99cKGw-- Received: from [59.140.58.30] by web100010.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp via HTTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:00:33 JST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.111_27 References: ,<68203.87104.qm@web100008.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> ,<190280.87846.qm@web100015.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:00:33 +0900 (JST) From: Knight Ao To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, Thanks for the useful info. I might try to insert a LPF or trap between the probe and the FET. There are several 100kW-500kW BC stations located nearby my location. GL & 73's, [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ja10xx[at]yahoo.co.jp) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_1 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4998b3eda037fec4e885bebc9a2db934 Subject: Re: LF: L400B LF engineering Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1705182857-1347962433=:69695" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.jp DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db405505846a36213 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-1705182857-1347962433=:69695 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0AHi Laurence,=0A=0AThanks for the useful info.=A0 I might try to inser= t a LPF or trap between=0Athe probe and the FET.=A0 There are several 100kW= -500kW BC stations=0Alocated nearby my location.=A0=A0=0A=0AGL & 73's,=0A= =0A=0AYas=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A>From: Laurence KL7U= K =0A>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0A>D= ate: 2012/9/18, Tue 11:05=0A>Subject: LF: L400B LF engineering=0A>=0A>=0A> = =0A>Hi Yas and greetings from Calgary Alberta.=0A>=0A>Yes the L400 has a 3 = inductor series=A0=A0single 10pf cap, and 2 resistor filter match prior to = the 5457 Fet and 3904 driver (fm memory) . I'm being canny as I'm sure its = a copyrighted design but significantly improves my situation here plagued w= ith 50Kw 550/650/750/1430 (1Kw) blowtorches. - it has a large output and dr= ives my 4 way splitter ok. Noise fig wise given the 10M in and other shunti= ng cap components it can't be brilliant but the LPF function reduces the no= n linear nature of the FET when present with mulitple 3dBm or worse signals= . This is my second L400 - the first one was dragged miles on Interstate 70= and still survived...=0A>=0A>Laurence VE6/KL1X Calgary AB=0A>=0A>>________= ________________________=0A>Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:04:09 +0900=0A>From: = ja10xx@yahoo.co.jp=0A>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0A>Subject: Re: LF: = 136 overnite=0A>=0A>=0A>Hi Laurence,=0A>=0A>=0A>Good to know your L400B is = working well.=A0 Is there much difference=0A>between L400B and PA0RDT-like = mini-whip in terms of influence=0A>from BC stations?=A0=A0 Seems L400B has = a BC trap or low pass =0A>=0A>filter.=A0 =0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>Anyway, look forwa= rd to your coming activities as there ain't much=0A>movement here in the pa= cific region.=0A>=0A>=0A>73's,=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>Yas=0A>=0A>=0A>----- Orig= inal Message -----=0A>>From: Laurence KL7UK =0A>>To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" =0A>= >Date: 2012/9/17, Mon 11:09=0A>>Subject: RE: LF: 136 overnite=0A>>=0A>>=0A>= > =0A>>Thanks Yas - yes I should have known given the CGM=A0 carrier signat= ure!=0A>>=0A>>. I was working on Rx stability but glad to see Japan coming = thru so well - the aim is to lock both tx and rx to GPS references and we a= re getting there - =0A>>=0A>>=0A>>I was using a LF Engineering L400B Omni p= robe at 50ft for info with R75 doing the hard work. It wasnt that quiet as = we had a strong weather system passing thru South Central Alaska - =0A>>=0A= >>Yes Im looking to be tx/rx QRV this end, probably not complete till the m= iddle of October -=A0 and just a few more rx changes and new driver, plus i= ssues in keeping the loop antennae up in the strong winds with flimsy trees= , but its coming together after nearly 6 years of not being on Tx.=A0 The n= ew cables to the Tuner were laid yesterday in the forest, and Im testing a = "short" Beverage that is looking over the North Pole - it appears nice and = quiet, but not=A0 that quiet that it worries=0A me.=0A>>=0A>>Cheers=0A>>Lau= rence KL1 X=A0 WE2X P Q =0A>>Wasilla AK=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>______= __________________________=0A>>Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:42:43 +0900=0A>>Fr= om: ja10xx@yahoo.co.jp=0A>>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0A>>Subject: Re= : LF: 136 overnite=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>Hi Laurence,=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>It's JA1CGM.=A0= Guess he used QRSS60 or so while your grabber=0A>>was set to QRSS120 slow = on Argo.=A0=A0 Any plan on QRV from your=0A>>end for JA/VK/ZL? =0A>>=0A>>= =0A>>=0A>>Look forward to your transmission.=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>73's,=0A>>=0A>>= =0A>>=0A>>=0A>>Yas - Tokyo (JA8SCD)=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>----- Original Messa= ge -----=0A>>>From: Laurence KL7UK =0A>>>To= : "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" =0A>>>Date: = 2012/9/17, Mon 02:56=0A>>>Subject: LF: 136 overnite=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>> =0A>>= >Signals seen overnight - think this is from JA? My Antennae was on Omni an= d too late for Eu=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>=0A> --0-1705182857-1347962433=:69695 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi La= urence,

Thanks for the useful info.  I might = try to insert a LPF or trap between
the probe and the FET.  = There are several 100kW-500kW BC stations
located nearby my locat= ion.  

GL & 73's,


Yas


----- Original Message -----
From: Laurence KL7UK <hellozerohelloze= ro@hotmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date= : 2012/9/18, Tue 11:05
= Subject: LF: L400B LF engineering

=0A=0A=0A
Hi Yas and g= reetings from Calgary Alberta.

Yes the L400 has a 3 inductor series&= nbsp; single 10pf cap, and 2 resistor filter match prior to the 5457 F= et and 3904 driver (fm memory) . I'm being canny as I'm sure its a copyrigh= ted design but significantly improves my situation here plagued with 50Kw 5= 50/650/750/1430 (1Kw) blowtorches. - it has a large output and drives my 4 = way splitter ok. Noise fig wise given the 10M in and other shunting cap com= ponents it can't be brilliant but the LPF function reduces the non linear n= ature of the FET when present with mulitple 3dBm or worse signals. This is = my second L400 - the first one was dragged miles on Interstate 70 and still= survived...

Laurence VE6/KL1X Calgary AB

Date: Mon, 17 S= ep 2012 16:04:09 +0900
From: ja10xx@yahoo.co.jp
To: rsgb_lf_group@bla= cksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: 136 overnite

Hi Laurence,

Good to know = your L400B is working well.  Is there much difference
between L400B and PA0RDT-like mini-whip in terms of influence=
from BC stations?   Seems L400B has a BC trap or= low pass
filter. 
<= span>
Anyway, look forward to your coming activi= ties as there ain't much
movement here in the pacifi= c region.

73's,


Yas<= /span>

----- Original Message -----
From: Laurence KL7UK <hellozerohellozero@hotmail.co= m>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: 2012/9/17, Mon 11:09
Subject: RE: LF: = 136 overnite

=0A=0A<= style>=0A=
=0ASignals seen overnight - think this is from JA? My Ante= nnae was on Omni and too late for Eu

=09=09 =09 =09=09
= =0A


=09=09 =09 = =09=09
=0A


=09= =09 =09 =09=09 =0A

--0-1705182857-1347962433=:69695--