Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc01.mx.aol.com (rly-dc01.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.30]) by air-dc06.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDC061-b024a967c493df; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:30:09 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc01.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC016-b024a967c493df; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:30:04 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Mge68-0007w7-VN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:29:00 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Mge68-0007vy-Fp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:29:00 +0100 Received: from mail-ew0-f225.google.com ([209.85.219.225]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mge5J-0002df-7T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:28:10 +0100 Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so1121341ewy.33 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eV5/wl6cY95PL3HgmKkxoyXTnJUWFj5hi1AOJgtF3s4=; b=SZZDxb4hYi8NsVTp06NdEr2mMdZ6qtABVgryT0+RE0UOXjHbtrWt1U6+dLbyjh3ZqU +kHYO+2EdOCpNaKn2IRcdrjQgckju3g7oEtwP9VDw1VKtfWoIXPh6aaSOcC35EbgHNhb 0V6OCsDIPjTUGPttX8rIGSDRzLxnajFkQytok= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=avjnALT5v76HmvW394U56Qw7TPDlO6uFhrXdSWrND5ny7g/kAdsOFPvYm10kWvTof+ 0ZkPu/DTvnw0k6mUhoIsCYGatffuyY9nbNk5RpgOsw5jRfE1SVwt/4p/8vsCIse1D6B+ 3lU4alhDHy6cgI4fpWY5/44uxISzoyjoXFl1U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.131 with SMTP id e3mr1905120wef.69.1251376126014; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9afca2640908270242t27862a25kdeb705e0963559b8@mail.gmail.com> References: <9afca2640908270242t27862a25kdeb705e0963559b8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:28:45 +0100 Message-ID: <8bf118410908270528v7875b839j82d2dc979e73e1f6@mail.gmail.com> From: Dave Pick To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR on LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab17178b5c304721eb520 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d301.2 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016e6dab17178b5c304721eb520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I guess we have to decide whether to go for the top or bottom of the band, I know some areas have problems with strong adjacent channel stuff. Would 135.85 be a good start? (I guess that's well out of Mal's way!) Dave G3YXM 2009/8/27 Roger Lapthorn > As someone who has just got interested in WSPR, I am surprised that this > mode of personal beaconing has not become extremely popular on 137 and > 500kHz. The bandwidth is only around 6Hz and the WSPR software is very > powerful and sensitive. As long as the system is supervised it can be run > "in the background" whilst other work is going on in the shack. Being an FSK > modulation scheme it does not require linear PAs. > > The main beauty is the ability to have stations around the world listening > and automatically reporting via the internet to a central WSPR database. It > means you can see who is hearing you, and who is not, how well they are > copying your signals and at what times of the day or night.The database can > be interrogated later and filtered by callsigns etc. It is perfect for > comparing antenna systems. The more people that are active then the better > the "propagation picture" becomes. People can also use the system just as > listeners and upload logs to the internet automatically. > > Getting active on WSPR on HF was extremely simple and the results quite > remarkable including 14 reports from Australia in a few days on 40m (all 5W > and one with 2W) - all with just a random 15m of wire from the gutter to a > small washing line pole down the garden. Results from a well equipped 137 or > 500kHz station can only be imagined. > > There is a summary page about WSPR on my website and links from it to much > better resources such as that by G4ILO. See > http://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp/Home/wspr > > 73s > Roger > G3XBM > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 > -- G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK --0016e6dab17178b5c304721eb520 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I guess we have to decide whether to go for the top or bottom of the= band, I know some areas have problems with strong adjacent channel stuff.= Would 135.85 be a good start? (I guess that's well out of Mal's= way!)
=A0
Dave G3YXM

2009/8/27 Roger Lapthorn <= rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>=
As someone who has just got= interested in WSPR, I am surprised that this mode of personal beaconing= has not become extremely popular on 137 and 500kHz. The bandwidth is only= around 6Hz and the WSPR software is very powerful and sensitive. As long= as the system is supervised it can be run "in the background"= whilst other work is going on in the shack. Being an FSK modulation schem= e it does not require linear PAs.

The main beauty is the ability to have stations around the world liste= ning and automatically reporting via the internet to a central WSPR databa= se. It means you can see who is hearing you, and who is not, how well they= are copying your signals and at what times of the day or night.The databa= se can be interrogated later and filtered by callsigns etc.=A0 It is perfe= ct for comparing antenna systems. The more people that are active then the= better the "propagation picture" becomes. People can also use= the system just as listeners and upload logs to the internet automaticall= y.

Getting active on WSPR on HF was extremely simple and the results quit= e remarkable including 14 reports from Australia in a few days on 40m (all= 5W and one with 2W) - all with just a random 15m of wire from the gutter= to a small washing line pole down the garden. Results from a well equippe= d 137 or 500kHz station can only be imagined.

There is a summary page about WSPR on my website and links from it to= much better resources such as that by G4ILO. See http://sites.google.= com/site/g3xbmqrp/Home/wspr

73s
Roger
G3XBM

--
-------------------------------------------------------------
<= a href=3D"http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://g3xbm-q= rp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.= uk
G3XBM =A0 =A0GQRP 1678 =A0 =A0 =A0ISWL G11088



--
G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK
--0016e6dab17178b5c304721eb520--