Return-Path: Received: from rly-me02.mx.aol.com (rly-me02.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.35]) by air-me04.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME042-9a44915e661393; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:20:13 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me02.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME028-9a44915e661393; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:20:03 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KytLF-0004t3-Bh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:19:29 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KytLE-0004su-K7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:19:28 +0000 Received: from smtp807.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.67]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KytLA-0000go-GS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:19:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 30862 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2008 19:19:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=px8XsRzg3rCOY4N9jpXp219o8sDEfcdEgtBqmGKiia30kMA+hOILyg7FHN50sxMH9n6k0+R2RbS8ggWeqdUW7YzRG9oYetNANJ64AsZg9Kff/hD9ozyKLLMDfF/QnpNsR9iMEBlMvM2UF5jOCw3dstEimeLIYEVRmlg9dcHQvjQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO DennisPC) (dennis.easterling@217.42.208.84 with login) by smtp807.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2008 19:19:18 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: LAr4crMVM1kFVqpTtk_ou0.ngQJJo2ruDsyFU6uIiovqevWySKvijmDvfs28rj1AJDhu8Ibls.qd45SFaPehPPocRlMC8N.g1GgABuZ_lsKhduUhFiYchhqoDeeGFD8bDnuRy9oGgGbKZ7poEZzpNeEO X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <8F8935EA4175485F9118E6D38D4240CA@DennisPC> From: "DENNIS EASTERLING" To: References: <128973.94319.qm@web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <128973.94319.qm@web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:19:13 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126 Subject: Re: LF: M0FMT calling CQ ON on 502.2kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0081_01C941D6.E2BFFED0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C941D6.E2BFFED0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter You are really getting out and about now with the updated TX, congratulation= s. Still getting on with the EW loop, but have got to get the car seen to. 73 Dennis M0JXM ----- Original Message -----=20 From: M0FMT=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 11:23 PM Subject: Re: LF: M0FMT calling CQ ON on 502.2kHz Hi Rik Just checked the reflector, OK you did get my report OK then I spent= too long sending and lost the final so was not sure if you got my report to= you. The QSB was deep but when you passed it back to me about 20:32 UTC you= were good and readable at 549 I hope you got that I have 539 for me on my p= ad here. I carried on calling ON in case we had not completed. Looks like we= did. So thank you very much for persevering with me and I hope to contact y= ou again on 500 I have heard you stronger in the past so there will be other= contacts. It was a good night for activity but I think conditions were poor= owing to QSB / QRN. 73 Petefmt Hi Paul Henrik Thank you very much for the report to night. GW3UEP, GI4DPE, G3KEV,=20= G3XPU all received hear with QSB, I pulled out at about 21:10 UTC. 73 petefmt --- On Fri, 7/11/08, Rik Strobbe wrote= : From: Rik Strobbe Subject: Re: LF: M0FMT calling CQ ON on 502.2kHz To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Friday, 7 November, 2008, 9:00 PM I can hear Pete 539 now calling CQ ON. We had a qso earlier tonight that ended in QRN and QSB, but reports =20 were exchanged so it is a valid QSO, unless I missed something. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Quoting Paul-Henrik : > Hello LF > > Just received M0FMT's CQ ON around 502.2kHz > > Q3 to Q5 signal. > > > 73's > > Paul-Henrik / OH1LSQ > Vaasa / KP03SD > > Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C941D6.E2BFFED0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Peter
 
You are really getting out and about now wi= th the=20 updated TX, congratulations.
Still getting on with the EW loop, but have= got to=20 get the car seen to.
 
73 Dennis M0JXM
----- Original Message -----
M0FMT <= /DIV>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 11:= 23=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: M0FMT calling CQ O= N on=20 502.2kHz

Hi Rik
 
Just checked the reflector, OK you did get my report OK then I=20 spent too long sending and lost the final so was not sure if you got= my=20 report to you. The QSB was deep but when you passed it back to me ab= out=20 20:32 UTC you were good and readable at 549 I hope you=20= got=20 that I have 539 for me on my pad here. I carried on calling ON in ca= se=20 we had not completed. Looks like we did. So thank you very much for=20 persevering with me and I hope to contact=20= you=20 again on 500 I have heard you stronger in the past so there will be=20 other contacts. It was a good night for activity but I think=20 conditions were poor owing to QSB / QRN. 73 Petefmt
 
Hi Paul Henrik
 
Thank you very much for the report to night. GW3UEP, GI4DPE, G3= KEV,=20 G3XPU all received hear with QSB, I pulled out at about 21:10 UTC.
73 petefmt

--- On Fri, 7/11/08, Rik Strobbe=20 <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be> wrote:
From:=20 Rik Strobbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>
Subject: Re: LF= :=20 M0FMT calling CQ ON on 502.2kHz
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Friday, 7 November, 2008, 9:= 00=20 PM

I can hear Pete 539 now calling CQ ON.
We had a qso earlier tonight that ended in QRN and QSB, but reports =20
were exchanged so it is a valid QSO, unless I missed something.

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T


Quoting Paul-Henrik <phl@netikka.fi>:

> Hello LF
>
> Just received M0FMT's CQ ON around 502.2kHz
>
> Q3 to Q5 signal.
>
>
> 73's
>
> Paul-Henrik / OH1LSQ
> Vaasa / KP03SD
>
>



Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C941D6.E2BFFED0--