Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CD80638000082; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 05:36:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TG541-0005NL-FF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:34:53 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TG541-0005NC-1s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:34:53 +0100 Received: from smtp4.virginbroadband.com.au ([123.200.191.54] helo=smtp.virginbroadband.com.au) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TG53y-0007ba-1P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:34:51 +0100 Received: from acerf441e6fc4f (unknown [119.12.160.106]) by smtp.virginbroadband.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F38B3DB00EE for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:34:41 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <8E3C43FCD08F4626AC02569BD2F04DC3@acerf441e6fc4f> From: "Edgar J Twining" To: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:34:33 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 123.200.191.54 (smtp4.virginbroadband.com.au) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtp.virginbroadband.com.au - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Richard VK7RO kindly compared the loop configurations as shown in my previous email via simulation in free space. There was difference of approximately 3dB in gain between the loops but no significant change in the 3D field pattern. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: LF: Loop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01CD9A8B.9FE2B960" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6185506029840980 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CD9A8B.9FE2B960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Richard VK7RO kindly compared the loop configurations as shown in = my previous email via simulation in free space. There was difference of approximately 3dB in gain between the loops but = no significant change in the 3D field pattern. The 3 m x 1m loop having less gain. =20 With loops of the same cross-sectional area, 2 m x 2 m and 4 m x 1 m = area there was only 1 dB difference and little difference in 3D pattern. Confirming comments made previously. Regards Edgar Moonah, Tasmania. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CD9A8B.9FE2B960 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
     Richard VK7RO = kindly=20 compared the loop configurations as shown in my previous email via = simulation in=20 free space.
 
There was difference of = approximately 3dB=20 in gain between the loops but no significant change in the = 3D field=20 pattern.
 
The 3 m x 1m loop having less = gain.
 
With loops of the same cross-sectional = area, 2 m x=20 2 m and 4 m x 1 m area there was only 1 dB difference and little = difference=20 in 3D pattern.
 
Confirming comments made = previously.
 
Regards Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.
 
    =
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CD9A8B.9FE2B960--