Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C7CDD380000AD; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:48:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SLIr7-0001S6-CW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:46:53 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SLIr6-0001Rx-Mb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:46:52 +0100 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SLIr3-0003G3-Dc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:46:51 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.46.198]) by mwinf5d61 with ME id 0Jml1j0054GZ68203JmlDV; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:46:48 +0200 Message-ID: <8CE7B218E1414CCF948FDAAF7F315812@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <747B7F1ACC2344CA812AF33D422316C0@AGB> <002d01cd1f1a$5abe8ae0$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <002d01cd1f1a$5abe8ae0$4001a8c0@lark> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:46:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120420-0, 20/04/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: R Alan, Yes a lot of myths linked to the 'Bright light's' of 136 , but I think the UK/VK full decode is yet to be achieved ? ive seen wiggles and squiggles down under , bit like starting a old vintage engine, spark plugs in the oven, that sort of thing , but not firing on all cylinders yet ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 318d3d373f5ffaa82e0969bd1985b258 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 136 propagation a QRO secret ? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:468834656:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41174f91af710560 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none R Alan, Yes a lot of myths linked to the 'Bright light's' of 136 , but I think the UK/VK full decode is yet to be achieved ? ive seen wiggles and squiggles down under , bit like starting a old vintage engine, spark plugs in the oven, that sort of thing , but not firing on all cylinders yet ? I did know about the previous tests , must of taken some setting up as well , we could do with a little of that old time pioneering spirit now, but I assume the same arguments must of accompanied the change from cw to slow ? The Op beacon and QSO mode ( 15 chrs 120 second tx -20 dB s/n) ,is certainly taking a can opener to the established norm's round s/n measurement and propagation observations at VHF and MF/LF , for example the day light path decodes from PA/RA on 136 , I for one always assumed , you needed near total darkness , not 3 or 4 hours of daylight in the path ! sure wspr would do the same thing , but thats not a MKC mode (Morse key compatible), using the 'Peoples Beacon' anyone can join in and get a set of results with any set up and with the longer tx times , the s/n is considerably lower , OP2 is about the same as wspr , with -3 db for every X2 in time , OP8 is -6 dB lower, and that's a lot of PA amps saved ! (power amps) USA stations are running on 145 MHz over a 250 mile path, using the OP0.5 (30 seconds) mode with good results as well. (showing as 70 MHz on the psk map, to prevent confusion , until a frequency can be defined) s/n 'mode' comparative measurements also are not always indicating the observed performance either , may be linked to the pulsed nature of the transmission , everything is referenced to 'average' in the Op system, the s/n reading is calibrated to the sim-path propagation software and takes the average of ' all ' the received data pulses , so if you loose 50% then the s/n is reported -3dB lower , its reporting the path usability rather than the max/min signals (ROS Hf + MF) gives a s/n and margin , which is the fade difference, between the lower and higher levels , ie two values are presented. 4 months in and it looks quite stable , number of false decodes are quite low , usually linked to 500 Khz operation , which sort of confirms , its a noisy place for some reason! at least its given a good justification for the experimental 500 licence as development for ROS-MF and Opera where both initiated by the 500 band allocation and operations ! 73 -G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Alan Melia" Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:20 PM To: Subject: LF: Re: 136 propagation a QRO secret ? > Hi Graham you may not be aware that the only modes that were available in > the early days when the 1st TAs were achieved was QRSS3. Robert Horne, > author of Spectrogram saw now use or reason for a slower > waterfall.....remember he is a biologist and this suite was written for > recording and analysing animal and marine mammal sounds. The results were > obtained in a period or high geomagnetic activity just after the peak of > the > last Solar max (Geomag activity trails sun-spots by about a year) We have > just had the quietest minimum for years and the level of activity is > relative to the last max still quite low. > > The modern digital modes are around 20dB more sensitive than QRSS3 this > accounts for the difference between 100s watts and less that 10 watts, > even > allowing for quieter conditions. I think this is what you usually call > "progress" :-)) > > Alan > G3NYK > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Graham" > To: > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 11:32 AM > Subject: LF: 136 propagation a QRO secret ? > > > Have the high power operators on 136 been keeping the real potential > of 136 propagation a secret ? writing you name in neon light is one > thing , but behind the glow of the sign , previously un seen, the data > recording Op beacon system is starting to reveal some interesting > features of this band. > > Results from the first 'plug and play' 'peoples' beacon, seem to > show , DX operation on 136 is not quite as difficult as was perhaps > made out , from the first TA decode of OP8 , using a > Parasol-on-a-Stick , with a few hundred watts , to RA3AGC long wire > to > the trees , with similar power and PA0A 'small array' .. 2000 Kmtr + > decodes are showing up on a quite regular basis , may be more than > that > offered by 500 KHz ? > > VK 136 operators have expressed interest in setting up sked's to > make, what could be the first full call sign decode , to down under, > but to date, it seems there are no transmit takers this side , > > Technically, the processing gain of OP32 , is very close to the > estimated -40 dB path loss , EU-VK and should require 16 mins of > carrier above the s/n threshold in 32 mins to decode ... > > Anyone tempted to make a sked ? > > G,, > > 24 hour usage from http://pskreporter.info/pskmapn.html > > Txmtr Rcvr Band Mode Distance Time (UTC) > 7L1RLL 7L1RLL 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:54:58 > PA3BHT PA3BHT 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:53:41 > PA0WMR PA0WMR 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:45:35 > JH1ARY JH1ARY 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:43:42 > UA0SNV-1 UA0SNV-1 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:36:19 > JP1ODJ JP1ODJ 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:34:55 > JF1PSS JF1PSS 2200m OPERA 0 kms 07:38:29 > UA0SNV UA0SNV 2200m OPERA 0 kms 07:33:19 >