Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E68D23800008A; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:04:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QrEzq-00059U-V3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:03:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QrEzq-00059L-GT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:03:22 +0100 Received: from mail-ew0-f43.google.com ([209.85.215.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEzo-0007qP-4G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:03:22 +0100 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so1019568ewy.16 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:03:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=TKfsKObmgjFmIfu4AgFWdzQMGgJu2iLEkhTIaqs9Lug=; b=SbGnC4VDoOszzdf1jcet86v1fwx9//eW7SZVgCr6zeEMquuv7WfMXdMzwyjnQRpp9E hvseU6i4lF4tjkGj1wr9jbyMnYRntDcYLfVjtNk0J0J8veweMTrOcVh8j77erUDbsEhu wsHSqOdvAK0Lz56hgCfxg9CEF3T0+PNdibIYs= Received: by 10.213.31.82 with SMTP id x18mr1096014ebc.54.1313006594250; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PcMinto (h50208.upc-h.chello.nl [62.194.50.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e3sm580107eea.41.2011.08.10.13.03.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8B4308E108A8499DAAAAD221713A676B@PcMinto> From: Minto Witteveen To: References: <4E418609.6020500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <67A6F7BF45BF4A0193A3DCB53000A283@PcMinto> <008401cc56ce$2f1fb2c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <12C475F3F4C84B818461753F2E8A60A6@PcMinto> <4E41AECB.90808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8D68749D37B94275855FDBA46A3F6C97@PcMinto> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:02:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: HB9ASB... Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:397413760:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m204.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404b4e42e46522db X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Roelof, Yes, the noise that is picked up in the house will travel to the miniwhip, that is also my experience. (But now I am a bit confused how it then gets back to the RX, by capacitive coupling to the e-probe or because the coax IS the antenna, or both. Have to think harder) Just as a test I created a choke in the coax, somewhere in the garden (wound some of the coax over a largish ferrite rod – will measure the achieved inductance later). The QRM from my Alinco SMPS when tested was noticeably lower, even though I did not ‘Ground’ (sorry Andy) the coax. Regards, Minto pa3bca -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse -----Original Message----- From: Roelof Bakker Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 21:26 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB... Hello Minto, Stefan, Some food for thoughts: When I tested a mini-whip in the garden with battery feed and also with a battery fed SLM, I found the noise lower than when used inside and operated from the mains. The coax cable from the house station was connected in parallel with the mini-whip by means of a BNC T-piece. The noise increased by 9 dB. My assumption is that this noise is received on the shield of the coax inside the house. Without connecting the shield to a separate radio earth, the noise received on the shield inside the house will travel over the shield all the way to the antenna. There the noise will be received by the sensitive probe. This will be by means of capacitively coupling, I guess. Many people have reported a large drop in local noise by connecting the shield at the bottom of the mast. This also applies to normal active whips of course. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt