Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8659538000090; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:52:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UkXmk-0008Vy-DH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:51:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UkXmk-0008Vp-0Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:51:14 +0100 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.4]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UkXmd-0003KB-L5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:51:11 +0100 Received: from F6CNIAndyHP (unknown [83.153.241.20]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 41DCD4C817D for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:51:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <89839D0C2679435898627697705F04C3@F6CNIAndyHP> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andre_Guy=E9?= To: References: <51AA488C.4020800@eastlink.ca> <9F4D930ED1F64F7C974C9F3570FE5DEA@White> <106509721.20130603101147@mterrier.net> <511259661.20130605104210@mterrier.net> <22F50727DAB943178CABF2FE9A731025@GaryAsus> <89A40DBD5FD24F7DAF1DC48FF71ABC37@White> <006801ce6251$bbd6c290$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:50:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3508.1109 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3508.1109 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130606-0, 06/06/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Joe, No problem. As usual, your QRSS signal gave here a strong trace this morning with peak around 0230 TU. Stable signal better than .005 Hz / 2 hours, no chirp. I was using my long Inv L antenna. Next time I will use the K9AY, it is a better RX antenna.... HI. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.27.42.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: LF: VO1NA - 137.7770 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608951b06a042253 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Joe, No problem. As usual, your QRSS signal gave here a strong trace this morning with peak around 0230 TU. Stable signal better than .005 Hz / 2 hours, no chirp. I was using my long Inv L antenna. Next time I will use the K9AY, it is a better RX antenna.... HI. On the way, I am very interested to copy your signal if you use OPERA 32 next days ? Best 73. Andy F6CNI JN19QB -----Message d'origine----- From: jcraig@mun.ca Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:14 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 137.7770 kHz Thanks Jay. I cant always see the sigs on your grabber and think perhaps the aerial does not radiate as well to the west. 73 Joe On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: > Joe > > A look from closer in ... http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html . > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 >