Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.97.134]) by air-db10.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB103-864c4d2a32331bf; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 17:09:55 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id ACDC238000083; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 17:09:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Pc3Ri-0000gw-7x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:09:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Pc3Rh-0000gn-Nx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:09:05 +0000 Received: from smtp7.freeserve.com ([80.12.242.2] helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pc3Rf-0003of-Jk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:09:05 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3j27.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C56B0300028C for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 23:08:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3j27.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B5B53300028E for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 23:08:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.51.254]) by mwinf3j27.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 79BFA300028C for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 23:08:57 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20110109220857498.79BFA300028C@mwinf3j27.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <896D0D91CCDF40709545E8158F767080@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <862D4B042BF545848D1B9780262E68E0@AGB> In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 22:08:56 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110109-0, 09/01/2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: ROS 502kHz & X Band Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B7_01CBB049.CF6C8D10" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61864d2a32310e73 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 ------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01CBB049.CF6C8D10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok Gary=20 Just back .. =20 The word from Mr Ros is , best not to run parallel sessions of= ROS , due to cup load distribution , I think it was -ok- in the= early versions but since the addition of the anti-jam and cod= e enhancements , its running at the edge ..and 'micro time' cpu = overloads are occurring that do not show on the meter , however= these degrade the performance ..=20 Best would be to call for MF-1 or 7 on the HF frequency , that= way the other station only needs to run -one- session - mf-7 is= a good 10 to 12 dB better than psk31 over the same path , so= should give good decodes ! 73 -G ..=20 From: Gary - G4WGT=20 Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 8:06 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: ROS 502kHz & X Band Graham,=20 Saw signal strong but no decode, I am set in 80M mode, ROS 4 best. Gary. On 9 January 2011 19:48, Graham wrote: called 3602 mf-7 and mf-1 looks no decode =20 that freq now has wide data as well=20 go to go out .. see iceland is decoding best ask for mf-7 repyl on 80 mtrs mf-7 is on on hf , 100hz wide=20 good luck ! G. From: Gary - G4WGT=20 Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 7:16 PM To: LF Group (RSGB)=20 Subject: LF: ROS 502kHz & X Band LF,=20 G4WGT 502kHz or 3602kHz X band. 3 minute beacon, please call. --=20 73,=20 Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo. LF MF Grabber - Web Site - Blogspot - 9kHz Grabber --=20 73,=20 Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo. LF MF Grabber - Web Site - Blogspot - 9kHz Grabber ------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01CBB049.CF6C8D10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok Gary
Just back ..  
 
The  word  from Mr Ros = ; is  ,=20 best not to  run  parallel  sessions of  ROS , due= to =20 cup load  distribution , I think  it was -ok- in the = early =20 versions but  since the  addition  of the  anti-ja= m =20 and  code enhancements , its  running  at the  edg= e=20 ..and  'micro time' cpu   overloads are  occurring= =20 that  do not  show  on the  meter , however these&= nbsp;=20 degrade the  performance ..
 
Best would be to  call  for=  =20 MF-1  or  7  on the HF frequency  , that  way= the =20 other  station only  needs to run -one- session - mf-7 = is =20 a good  10  to  12 dB better  than  psk31 ove= r=20 the  same path , so  should give  good  decodes=20 !
 
73 -G ..

Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS 502kHz & X Band

Graham,=20

Saw signal strong but no decode, I am set in 80M mode, ROS 4 best= .

Gary.

On 9 January 2011 19:48, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.= co.uk>=20 wrote:
called   3602  = mf-7 =20 and  mf-1   looks no  decode 
 
that  freq  now has = wide data=20 as  well
go  to  go  out ..= see =20 iceland  is  decoding
best  ask  for  mf-7= repyl on 80=20 mtrs   mf-7
is on on hf  , 100hz wide
 
good luck  !
 
G.

Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 7:16 PM
Subject: LF: ROS 502kHz & X Band

LF,=20




=

--
73,=20

Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo.





------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01CBB049.CF6C8D10--