Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w43MKJ62009266 for ; Fri, 4 May 2018 00:20:23 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fEMQd-00065U-V5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 23:10:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fEMQU-00065L-S5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 23:10:10 +0100 Received: from rgout0305.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.211] helo=rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fEMQQ-0002oY-QV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 23:10:09 +0100 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.161.107.48 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedthedrtdefgddtkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefkhffvfhfuffggtgfgrfgioffqsehtjeejtddutdejnecuhfhrohhmpedftehlrghnucfovghlihgrfdcuoegrlhgrnhdrmhgvlhhirgessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepughffehlphdruggvnecukfhppeekiedrudeiuddruddtjedrgeeknecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopehgnhgrthdpihhnvghtpeekiedrudeiuddruddtjedrgeekpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegrlhgrnhdrmhgvlhhirgessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeorhhsghgspghlfhgpghhrohhuphessghlrggtkhhshhgvvghprdhorhhgqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt Received: from gnat (86.161.107.48) by rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.26-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5ACB666F028FFF24 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 3 May 2018 23:10:03 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1525385406; bh=XK/hnFBQxjRpyURQZuhmscNMQS5Orua3eZ5j2E/9wOo=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=ocAtAQy4q5TSQLrut/CYa/kHNTqEqQ5y3eD621TyDH4wfQWOoGDZ3BGYKGanaRev+3W8BFMV9lu/uIYq3M9PBginX11iNhnVTvQawmrQlsduTBR136cqUPGjQIUW78VL9c+SlvDx8g6vsAOLYA6VFGVvaoWL4d6N14PTgfs18kc= Message-ID: <88A68052FD9744748AF4DF015BE522DB@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <7BEFCE23-3244-45F0-979D-2EA0777850F1@md.metrocast.net> <5ADEEF82.6030607@posteo.de> <5AE0449E.9070606@posteo.de> <5AE06CD9.7000809@posteo.de> <5AE0DF9D.9050106@posteo.de> <5AE867D9.9090706@posteo.de> <5c9b9570-015c-224c-a2ca-68d79fc650cc@abelian.org> <5AEAD6DD.7010804@posteo.de> <3A52FE1D16D94F5ABE4790254BDD2503@gnat> <515dd47a-4d97-15eb-fb2e-1edc72220c2e@df3lp.de> Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 22:54:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Peter I have been discussing lighning<>.propagation effects with Jim Bacon G3YLA a weather expert, also interested in SpE. I am sure I have your plot somewhere but I have had a few PC changes since the time. He once told me weather is in the stratosphere below 30km nowhere near the ionosphere. I think everyone agrees it is not as clearcut as that now. I am wondering is the decay rate might indicate the height of the effect. Is the stoke inducing charge at 50 to 60 km, of higher. Comparison with SID trace decays might also be interesting. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: Re: ULF: A new band is opened up! 191 km | DL0AO results Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks Peter I have been discussing lighning<>.propagation effects with Jim Bacon G3YLA a weather expert, also interested in SpE. I am sure I have your plot somewhere but I have had a few PC changes since the time. He once told me weather is in the stratosphere below 30km nowhere near the ionosphere. I think everyone agrees it is not as clearcut as that now. I am wondering is the decay rate might indicate the height of the effect. Is the stoke inducing charge at 50 to 60 km, of higher. Comparison with SID trace decays might also be interesting. I was optimistic about the level of enhancement it looks like 5 to8dB, I think I must have been assuming the grid was 10dB not 5. Great capture, thanks. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "P. W. Schnoor" To: Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2018 5:46 PM Subject: Re: ULF: A new band is opened up! 191 km | DL0AO results > Hi Alan et al., > > On 03.05.2018 12:11, You wrote: > >> ... I suppose its possible Peter still has it. So it would seem there is >> the possibility of lightning strkes injecting charge into the ionosphere. > > http://www.df3lp.de/misc/hga22/2012-07-02_thunderstorm.png > > Found that link in my E-Mail archives... > > 73 de df3lp, > Peter >