Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B0D7E38000096; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:36:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TT0jW-0007BE-M9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:35:10 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TT0jV-0007B5-TU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:35:09 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TT0jT-00053m-On for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:35:08 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hq12so2122543wib.10 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:35:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:in-reply-to:x-mimeole :x-gm-message-state; bh=s+jpxxJ1o6O0LZUtVWLfmLBWYHGfJTkzS8jFWpdq00A=; b=PqILshTR0vKqJOZKF+zLeLOsJPBN1PU1pDj9IyDyk1VxIhXTGkwRVbey5MapEHokFh 2+7TaRX4ydOy2F9ko/5s9O12HOYh84lt36gnB/8s3zZjvvR5uiimqATzEAsiVqmrR1BK DhNYm2KC056527dqSD85KsPmvXvpNNhN+EAS8/YAwWIvwSdD28gB7c6NAGFQG8XaFiVb RlgMprr73lKxAPt6nQyTwi1E8GGWBSitsCU7480qT7nKkhdcJIqNpirniNzucHpwynnZ rsBVinNxhGKBodAFKVprPrjLHPNyr3Hi+HdJ/J8a2G1ZINnWS6ot9YsGvPqMR8eXIziY GElA== Received: by 10.216.137.94 with SMTP id x72mr16218129wei.187.1351560907058; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from intelp4 (host81-135-21-166.range81-135.btcentralplus.com. [81.135.21.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o3sm9834860wiz.9.2012.10.29.18.35.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:35:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Terry GW0EZY To: References: <508D92BE.2040500@broadpark.no> <508ED047.1000504@broadpark.no> <508EF371.4070103@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <000001cdb634$f34c9750$d9e5c5f0$@com> <508F200B.3010602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1F412345CB394E4EB567E69227A02B7F@intelp4> <508F23F6.4080801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0BAC9615B65348F4B85C29FB240692EE@intelp4> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:35:04 -0000 Message-ID: <87D0548217184BC58AF939DEA4CF768C@intelp4> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac22OLVQhvaomN09RDGRXRU54t2PZQAAr9kgAAC0OLA= In-Reply-To: <0BAC9615B65348F4B85C29FB240692EE@intelp4> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkceTWLMXtG9xpUMLx0s0I+xqzmYk6+oBZVApcQ/M43Yb7eS+ZtCKPqu34IxP6KYF06v/l9/wGB/zTxc4P6BciyTeWf9ormZjVkCyQXhHqErf0SEtXg0LCiZL8fq6Qci5LYJ9cl+VrrzgLsvGH7D1ZLWLV1RekiAtGhDt1maE4IeSzvXCUimLscyOhQZVYrbGU7GaQL X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Decode OK but same again – Sync and dB values shown as **** (usually indicates values exceed expected) 0120********* 0.9 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK I have reduced the tolerance to +/- 10. I checked JT9-30 and the Wide Graph scale shifts again requiring another retune and increase of FFT Bins/Pixel to get 1140 kHz on screen (136.3 + 1140) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.181 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 75d539362fc79d60c5509fd0caf011e8 Subject: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003B_01CDB63E.CA0ED650" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad0508f2f056d05 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01CDB63E.CA0ED650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Decode OK but same again =96 Sync and dB values shown as **** (usually indicates values exceed expected) =20 0120********* 0.9 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 I have reduced the tolerance to +/- 10. I checked JT9-30 and the Wide = Graph scale shifts again requiring another retune and increase of FFT = Bins/Pixel to get 1140 kHz on screen (136.3 + 1140) =20 73 Terry =20 _____ =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Terry GW0EZY Sent: 30 October 2012 01:14 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC =20 A decode of your JT9-10 transmission. I wonder why the Sync and dB = values are shown as **** ?? =20 0100********* 0.4 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 =20 Waiting for JT9-30 ?? =20 I thought you would prefer to stay with BS =96 sigh! =20 73 Terry =20 _____ =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer Sent: 30 October 2012 00:49 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC-DF6NM =20 Am 30.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Terry GW0EZY:=20 Stefan getting regular decodes from you =96 every 10 minutes. Will also = try your JT9-10. Let us all know if another frequency offset is required. No, i'll stay at 137.44 kHz over the night. =20 Sending emails is a pain! Is it? I like it :-) 73, Stefan ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01CDB63E.CA0ED650 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Decode OK but same again – = Sync and dB values shown as **** (usually indicates values exceed = expected)

 

0120*********=A0=A0 0.9 1138.38=A0 = 0.00=A0=A0=A0 DK7FC JN49IK

 

I have reduced the tolerance to +/- = 10. I checked JT9-30 and the Wide Graph scale shifts again requiring another = retune and increase of FFT Bins/Pixel to get 1140 kHz on screen (136.3 + = 1140)

 

73 = Terry

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Terry GW0EZY
Sent: 30 October 2012 = 01:14
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: JT9-10 = Decode DK7FC

 

A decode of your JT9-10 = transmission. I wonder why the Sync and dB values are shown as **** = ??

 

0100*********   0.4 1138.38  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK  =

 

Waiting for JT9-30 = ??

 

I thought you would prefer to stay = with BS – sigh!

 

73 = Terry

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4fer
Sent: 30 October 2012 = 00:49
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: = DK7FC-DF6NM

 


Am 30.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Terry GW0EZY:

Stefan getting regular decodes from you – every = 10 minutes. Will also try your JT9-10. Let us all know if another frequency = offset is required.


No, i'll stay at 137.44 kHz over the night.

 

Sending emails is a = pain!

Is it? I like = it :-)


73, Stefan

------=_NextPart_000_003B_01CDB63E.CA0ED650--