Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.217]) by air-mb04.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINMB044-a2c34dd8c894fe; Sun, 22 May 2011 04:25:56 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 817BB380000AB; Sun, 22 May 2011 04:25:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QO3yO-0008M4-1l for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:25:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QO3yN-0008Lt-JZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:25:15 +0100 Received: from nm10.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.251]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QO3yN-0000Ad-GW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:25:15 +0100 Received: from [217.146.183.208] by nm10.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2011 08:25:09 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.179] by tm1.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2011 08:25:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1020.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2011 08:25:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 321302.786.bm@omp1020.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 62646 invoked by uid 60001); 22 May 2011 08:25:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1306052709; bh=qDIe9cL51cr6SSKsKO/i+mDF7nEXGoOH2mSjz4st7HU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KPNimcFInedF3wc2TJ+KDdn3VOWb9Jbv8Sn7UkM9AzytuOEYQYCdPenEWUemelhr/aoZBQ+n/m/RF4mBF1JxV9ZzO4VCBW1l5cCad+8Kap9+u4kqRrSpZ5B6QchxJTzYQqRuaOLhYQGKikD/5KrXYFVV3M4OgZjzMVpvaXIM6Ng= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eoRDGXuZHLv9nCaa6mVmRyOTUnNoQRnbX8raXMAuYMlJNg+dZBg8k8KVCmNKawwnmUtrbEmkZTQeKry3g06ExLVf6Gfr6KhpPebl85eeo/k5BAhJy2QJLliyZQfYoAet8wQHEefmqeEXg0B0qstg5wxGJOUjooVHEIs7BW2hOLk=; Message-ID: <86450.59133.qm@web28510.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: POPbT9sVM1mi9htnZr_aG0niDWVM20htIeAZDXxzfsm6YGQ Z3mqg6z30UlCFTstJrLVONQhIA0dsEhS4UPzpjLMLV12nRdO8Ru.xaZnCceH iCTU5ARjjsQ1eN3978tRpO11OIEdBls2S0tcXRxDqkdJxBV.xedq3RWu8HDF 3Fhwa7.ZkEKyk1V6nDbTREpu_O1BkUajvmRpDFRoVC.pPSUc5T6pDZ7ayjPy kkuKt_HXtca4NDBjTDK7ttenc5vGcF94CDnIbJ9SsENJSrs9aZWCBei84j4S GQAs_gSyIDrncSTjThDePqpU- Received: from [81.97.191.183] by web28510.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:25:08 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 09:25:08 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Osborn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: Re: LF - G3XIZ calling CQ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-606193223-1306052708=:59133" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m229.1 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d94dd8c8926892 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-606193223-1306052708=:59133 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Albert, Many thanks for the CW QSO on 136.5 kHz I was receiving you 100% solid copy despite local QRM. Hopefully my signals will be much improved the next time we have an LF QSO 73 Chris G3XIZ --- On Sun, 22/5/11, Albert wrote: From: Albert Subject: LF: Re: LF - G3XIZ calling CQ To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sunday, 22 May, 2011, 9:02 =20 =20 Chris, =A0 I can hear ur CW sigs on 136.5 kHz but to weak for=20 QSO abt 30% cpi =A0 73, Albert PA0A=A0 --0-606193223-1306052708=:59133 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Albert,

Many thanks for the CW= QSO on 136.5 kHz
I was receiving you 100% solid copy despite local QRM= .

Hopefully my signals will be much improved the next time we have= an LF QSO

73 Chris G3XIZ

--- On Sun, 22/5/11, Albert = <westberg@xs4all.nl> wrote:
From: Albert <westberg@xs4all.nl>
Subject: LF: Re: LF - G3XIZ ca= lling CQ
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Sunday, 22 May, 2011= , 9:02

=20 =20
Chris,
 
I can hear ur CW sigs on 136.5 kHz bu= t to weak for=20 QSO abt 30% cpi
 
73, Albert PA0A 
--0-606193223-1306052708=:59133--