Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.11]) by air-ma06.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINMA062-b5294ba3718663; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:43:50 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CF4FB380000E0; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:43:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NsbXb-0006Z0-Ct for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:43:03 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NsbXa-0006Yr-VP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:43:02 +0000 Received: from web86702.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.143]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NsbXX-0004BB-PJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:43:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 65004 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Mar 2010 12:42:54 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1269002574; bh=ZmbLw0xAsoa4R2TGZTlXh8DBrj55BWZTeE1DqQYgPP8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=c9MZYRKpLHm5nG2ntGyfu9fAtV+EvOzqDnis5JKstW3c6JlFuqGDtILSqzsV86jOIrgyuUuj+Zw04n/Rx87HqA+qqfjuJwPUF78rFv/QYpDeWaVHTCPDJh0NqLiAMPBoLDLp2GaEA5Wqot8CE3vjwAiDyqLAAvDLCrn23bp8cL8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SYpEW0YBNIk+GaJV8jJ4dPmFHIgMBACoYSTD71NPCU1ItnE/sNnapG95PynsF46YkMbNe6qP0H5AMdA4Bdm/EfCtZbiLo4Hr1dr9dRc9mEcJpiOnt7pWh0yeJ14Ln/uDb+5WfICPT/nAYo7B0svbKbMrRnvaMdNV8hYOKF6ZJY0=; Message-ID: <84409.64159.qm@web86702.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: mID27b0VM1m7FkjpN74gG.AU7edSHHQPUYsLe0D7cG1S1_4 q3_sFKAoZePkl_2Vcq2m1feRyJkg1NI4pC3TkS6wE.NXGsFY.3mYiY5apNu2 aIhkrk.Rg7oPXrRpAuozu_tdrij6RvthaXYMPUQCPEut1A6G7S9jhDMP5buu ODuiivfV99MXgxWlbMsB3IBztklBN0gE9MxnRss_0xsWfY3fF8vuxhzOawxq 2arN16ouYzG.el31Q6LvuZjIwKpv88sRpA4hICBjV1CY7D.C9oadUf90eNuq 43A5iCupuXq2jIOYqADdeEoD8zXsbnQLNhFefH4G9 Received: from [132.185.144.123] by web86702.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:42:54 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/324.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <000001cac47a$f4ba1350$0202a8c0@laptopcore2> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B57@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <4B9F82C9.3000301@abelian.org> <4B9FB3F5.6030707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4B9FE483.8020806@abelian.org> <006D51ECA524413B84D8C0019B2FE99C@JimPC> <4BA130EC.1040509@abelian.org> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B6E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:42:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Dave Pick To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B6E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: more RX stns needed Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1256337254-1269002574=:64159" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d293.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600b4ba371836232 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 --0-1256337254-1269002574=:64159 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Group I can't promise calibrated results but the receiver seems to be working qu= ite well on my longwire - audible copy on all Alpha stations. I will leave= it running over the weekend at wireless.org.uk/grab (grabber 3). At prese= nt is on QRSS30 settings, is this OK or should it be slower? Dave ________________________________ From: Stefan Sch=E4fer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wednesday, 17 March, 2010 20:52:22 Subject: VLF: more RX stns needed >Really, more receivers are needed - calibrated receivers that can return useful measurements. Yes, really. And who could be one of those?=20 Does one of the italian OMs know more about the website http://www.vlf.it/= ? There should be many interestets and probably well equipped stations. And= italy is a good distance. The alps may be no problem ;-) I have seen a RX spectrogram of the 82Hz ELF transmitter there, so there= seem to be people who are really active in RXing... Sri, i cannot stop dreaming now. 73, Stefan --0-1256337254-1269002574=:64159 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Group
 
I can't promise calibrated results but the receiver seems to be worki= ng quite well on my longwire - audible copy on all Alpha stations. I will= leave it running over the weekend at wireless.org.uk/grab (grabber 3). At= present is on QRSS30 settings, is this OK or should it be slower?

Dave

=
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <= ;schaefer@hst.tu-darmstadt.de>
= To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Wednesday, 17 March, 2010 20:52:22
Subject: VLF: more RX stns needed<= BR>

>Really, more receivers are needed - calibrated receivers= that
can return useful measurements.

Yes, really. And who could= be one of those?

Does one of the italian OMs know more about the= website http://www.vlf.it/= ?
There should be many interestets and probably well equipped stat= ions. And italy is a good distance. The alps may be no problem ;-)
I ha= ve seen a RX spectrogram of the 82Hz ELF transmitter there, so there seem= to be people who are really active in RXing...

Sri, i cannot stop= dreaming now.

73, Stefan
--0-1256337254-1269002574=:64159--