Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0949638000098; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:02:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSzGM-0005Tr-CL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSzGL-0005Ti-QR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:57 +0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSzGK-0004Rm-8e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:56 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ez12so3049478wgb.28 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:00:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :in-reply-to:x-mimeole:x-gm-message-state; bh=dGeNoiD521qjq7gD+5zcliyl0WYUPio7cwLdg0gN4i0=; b=W0sPWlccjx7MqWPo033Bx3lTsscl9d+fnMOOCInmuQcJREYhYi4IESlCEZaiiF3xzN MufbJZa3LYM0O8xYvcxPvd75vSep/tr1HMWOSUxb0mdRgxy2PSJwB3zYg6hY5g5KykjI 8wYZwvZBvy7kWH48XKA94AJXC7dK8AY2/00qx19LoXANmvtOZX3L619lW8gR0aK50/DC ippXq5/Gquz4hVfWOMMbQ5RY02yWzsR26UuzMY/sG18HAeDVE02alxy5b04Q94A4CKpR MAmlPNH3oSPJEHZfAnGIz6Gbuef7uYPbaUTuuukHXuu9E0nC3HzY1Hhow2VbJ5m+Esr0 qflA== Received: by 10.216.132.142 with SMTP id o14mr16389506wei.12.1351555255690; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from intelp4 (host81-135-21-166.range81-135.btcentralplus.com. [81.135.21.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hb6sm11873522wib.7.2012.10.29.17.00.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:00:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Terry GW0EZY To: References: <01c801cdb62a$c0069170$4013b450$@simnet.is> <508F1276.4030809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:53 -0000 Message-ID: <8355E3A30B074B1F90A088E8DBFF9182@intelp4> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac22LmCorPH4yaHxQ/udjbeFq/KfegAAsg8w In-Reply-To: <508F1276.4030809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnlFXrkFcUtB/ZVZuM8WwEEGmc4jv4goc1zkzvcUv7u4iGR/vsRrLePI58t+ecVZnGllIQaKOKLSLSF45U+hpskKAx9qCS/jInd43Kf02A5qoMef9Gc/f161ngsnT5hVERJA/A8aFX5lDjin8YdcA8FeBvXg+4wm+BWeLOsTIHfpd4521A3KYhhVMD+0LmXMogzcP5I X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Rx now tuned to 136.3 and decode OK: 2350 10 1 0.7 1138.33 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Strange to have this frequency offset when changing from JT9-2 to JT9-5 [...] Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.82.47 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: LF: DK7FC JT9-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d9508f18fe5d77 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Rx now tuned to 136.3 and decode OK: 2350 10 1 0.7 1138.33 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Strange to have this frequency offset when changing from JT9-2 to JT9-5 It took over 2 minutes to decode (Win7-32 2.84 GHz 4-core) 73 GW0EZY -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer Sent: 29 October 2012 23:34 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Who has two cats? Hello Halld=F3r, Thank you and congratulations! I have no decode so far :-/ But i want to = try to decode my own signal on a Win7 PC soon, just to check if that=20 makes a difference here. Now switched to JT9-5. I saw the program is limited to 1200 Hz in that=20 range, i.e. to 137.2 kHz. But i want to stay in the allocated digi mode=20 range of the LF band plan. So one has to turn the dial to 136.3 kHz and=20 then i am at 1140 Hz (ish) again. 73, Stefan Am 30.10.2012 00:11, schrieb Halld=F3r: > My first decode JT-9 > > 2304 10 -21 0.4 1442.77 0.00 I HAVE 2 CATS > > 73 > Halld=F3r > TF3HZ >