Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=3 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s77DccZ6022324 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:38:38 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XFNqA-0008SB-8p for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:34:46 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XFNq9-0008S2-Vy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:34:45 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNq7-0001r1-U1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:34:44 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.145.230.195]) by mwinf5d23 with ME id bpah1o00H4Dc3Db03paiq8; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:34:42 +0200 X-ME-Helo: AGB X-ME-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:34:42 +0200 X-ME-IP: 95.145.230.195 Message-ID: <7F7B8095903449919A60252034CEAA64@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:34:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Scan-Signature: 4a8faa6952847c1ec651f883b63fc053 Subject: Re: LF: Receivers for LF and MF 136 KHz @ 477KHz ??? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0030_01CFB24C.B989FB00" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 173 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01CFB24C.B989FB00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable web sdr using , low ish price, , compact sdr and mini whip .. any = one used this 100K > 30 MHz [ vhf possible ] sdr ? http://g7jjp-websdr.no-ip.org:8901/ http://www.afedri-sdr.com G, From: Graham=20 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 1:13 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: Receivers for LF and MF 136 KHz @ 477KHz ??? Receivers for LF and MF 136 KHz @ 477 KHz=20 =20 A question,=20 =20 Starting at the =A35 dongle rigged for direct sample , as a = cheap effective starting point =20 A pre amp and pre - selector [ band pass filter ] would help for = lf/mf=20 =20 What would be in a scale of increasing performance [ not cost !] = be seen as reasonable in terms of configuration and hardware ? Any particular equipments stand out as good cost/performance = choices ? Tnx Graham G0NBD ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01CFB24C.B989FB00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

web sdr using , low ish price, , compact = sdr =20 and mini whip .. any one used =20 this 100K > 30 MHz [ vhf possible ] sdr = ?

http://g7jjp-websdr.no-ip.or= g:8901/

From: Graham

Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 1:13 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20

Subject: LF: Receivers for LF and MF 136 KHz @ 477KHz=20 ???

Receivers for LF and MF 136 KHz @ 477 KHz

A question,=20

Starting at=20 the =A35 dongle rigged for direct sample , as a cheap effective starting point

A pre amp and pre - selector [ = band pass=20 filter ] would help for lf/mf

What would be =20 in a scale of increasing performance [ not cost !]

be seen=20 as reasonable in terms of configuration and hardware ?

Any=20 particular equipments stand out as good =20 cost/performance choices ?

Tnx

Graham

G0NBD

------=_NextPart_000_0030_01CFB24C.B989FB00--