Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26771 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 14:13:05 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 14:13:05 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 2508 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 14:12:57 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 14:12:56 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17Zvu0-0002Ns-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:00:44 +0100 Received: from relay.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.49]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17Zvtz-0002Nn-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:00:43 +0100 Received: (qmail 17826 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 15:09:14 +0100 Received: from butterfly.mod.uk (HELO warlock.dstl.gov.uk) (192.5.29.10) by relay.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 15:09:14 +0100 Message-ID: <7D653C9C42F5D411A27C00508BF8803DCB9B56@mail.dstl.gov.uk> From: "Talbot Andrew" To: "LF Group \(E-mail\)" Subject: LF: Droitwich Carrier Curiouser and curiouse r, correction Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:08:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Correction :-( I looked at the Droitwich carrier again after reading Jim's posting. Using the same setup as described there definitely is a dB or two of variation - had Gram on 90dB dynamic range yesterday which explains why I didn't see anything then. Try this if you have a suitable Rx : Select CW mode with a wide bandwidth to encompass all the AM signal - like 6kHz. Then set the BFO to 3kHz, or half the IF bandwidth, so the entire transmission gives an audio output ranging from DC to 6kHz with the carrier appearing as a 3kHz tone in the middle. Look at this downconverted signal on Gram using 22kHz sampling at 512 or 1024 FFT size, viewing the line spectrum, not the colour waterfall / spectrogram. Any voice/music sidebands appear equally, either side of the carrier exactly as AM theory predicts they will, BUT the amplitude does indeed drop slightly as the sidebands appear. It almost suggests the transmitter is adjusted to give a constant output power - there's a thought ! One way to check would be measure the total power in the signal in a 6kHz (better still 8kHz) bandwidth and plot this out over a few seconds. Not unsurprisingly, none of the PD software available includes this option so I've recorded a few seconds of .WAV file of this downconverted signal and can have a go at processing that. It just may be my imagination, but the power appeared to reduce a fraction of a second BEFORE the sidebands popped up. This is at variance with Jim's plot which appeared to show simultaneity. But if he was receiving the carrier in a narrow bandwidth there would be a filter delay which might account for the discrepancy. My technique delays all components equally BTW, the WJ Rx is a superb piece of kit for monitoring and measuring RF. DC to 30MHz coverage with around 60 different IF bandwidths possible from 56Hz to 16kHz. Not that user friendly, though, if all you want to do is to actually listen to the signals. Only trouble is, the WJ-8711 costs several thousand pounds and is subject to export restrictions from the US ! Must get back to doing some proper work now. Andy G4JNT > Dear LF Group, > > I looked at the Droitwich signal using Spectrum Lab last night - the phase > modulated signal occupies a BW of about 80Hz centered on the carrier - > however, measuring the carrier level in 100Hz Bandwidth instead of 25Hz > made no difference to the fluctuations in carrier level, so that blew my > theory of yesterday out of the water... > "This e-mail is intended for the recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely upon this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by replying to this e-mail." "Recipients should note that all e-mail traffic on MOD systems is subject to monitoring and auditing."