Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0DF6938000081; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:38:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TsfvK-0001Z3-KU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:37:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TsfvK-0001Yu-6K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:37:26 +0000 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TsfvI-0002wp-Cr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:37:25 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.16.164]) by mwinf5d22 with ME id lYd31k00s3YP8Wy03Yd3Uf; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:37:04 +0100 Message-ID: <7BA69D954A4D46DFA9F3490DF8719473@AGB> From: "Graham" To: Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 20:37:03 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Why WSPR when you can TALK? For those stations sending wspr and decoding wspr two-way , it may not be first apparent , but the minimum signal level WSPR decodes at is the same as ROS-MF-2 data mode Unless you are sending wspr from a pic-dds , then by audio or SDR the ROS-MF-2 ( and MF-7) data modes can be sent via the same path [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: LF: Why WSPR when you can TALK? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00DC_01CDEDDF.EACD85C0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8d50ec83c11c00 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00DC_01CDEDDF.EACD85C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Why WSPR when you can TALK? For those stations sending wspr and decoding wspr two-way , it = may not be first apparent , but the minimum signal level WSPR = decodes at is the same as ROS-MF-2 data mode=20 Unless you are sending wspr from a pic-dds , then by audio or = SDR the ROS-MF-2 ( and MF-7) data modes can be sent via the = same path=20 Downloaded from the same web site as the opera beacon , ROS data = mode shares the same low equipment over heads ,in terms of = stability and no time locking requirement and offers quite = reliable data comms in 100 Hz b/w=20 ROS-MF was developed during the initial 501<>504 allocation and = remains perhaps the lowest , single pass , live qso data mode = available to date , there being no limit to text length .=20 The s/n reported is the average along the time line , along = with the margin of signal over the minimum decode level , The = Opera beacon is completely in indicating path suitability , but = is capable of lower s/n decode levels=20 As in Opera , cq web beacon and linking to the psk-reporter is = provided , where activity and s/n levels may be downloaded=20 http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/ ------=_NextPart_000_00DC_01CDEDDF.EACD85C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Why WSPR when you can TALK?
 
For those  stations   sending  wspr  = and =20 decoding  wspr  two-way  , it  may not  be = first=20 apparent  , but  the  minimum  signal  = level =20 WSPR  decodes  at  is the  same as  = ROS-MF-2 =20 data  mode
 
Unless  you  are  sending  wspr  from = a =20 pic-dds  , then  by  audio  or  SDR the =20 ROS-MF-2  ( and  MF-7)  data  modes  can  = be =20 sent  via the  same  path
 
Downloaded from the  same  web site as the  = opera =20 beacon , ROS data  mode  shares the  same  low  = equipment  over  heads ,in terms of  stability  = and =20 no  time  locking  requirement  and offers  = quite =20 reliable  data  comms  in  100 Hz  b/w
 
ROS-MF was  developed  during  the  initial=20 501<>504  allocation  and  remains  perhaps = the =20 lowest  , single  pass  , live qso   data  = mode  available  to  date , there  being  = no =20 limit  to  text length .
 
The   s/n  reported is the  average  = along =20 the  time  line  , along  with the  = margin =20 of  signal over the  minimum decode  level , The =20 Opera  beacon  is  completely  in  = indicating =20 path  suitability , but  is  capable  of  = lower =20 s/n  decode  levels
 
As in  Opera , cq  web  beacon and  linking to=20 the  psk-reporter is provided , where  activity and s/n = levels =20 may  be downloaded
 
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
------=_NextPart_000_00DC_01CDEDDF.EACD85C0--