Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.222]) by air-de07.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDE073-5ebc4bafa3a62f5; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:44:54 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B26F73800009B; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:44:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NvxSb-0004ct-QK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:43:45 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NvxSb-0004ck-Dd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:43:45 +0100 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.159]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NvxSZ-00014E-Kb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:43:45 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3431.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 775F67000098 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:43:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3431.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6A2287000099 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:43:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.54.169]) by mwinf3431.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id EBC747000098 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:43:34 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20100328184334965.EBC747000098@mwinf3431.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <7A6010C0609B43C19622305C656A7FD7@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <4BAF2B2D.1010300@dsl.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <4BAF2B2D.1010300@dsl.pipex.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:43:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100328-0, 28/03/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Antenna Matching Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60de4bafa3a41d1e X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Tim, I Started using a parallel tuner , with a 4 gang tuning capacitor , this was fine up to about 45 watts , with the tx tapped 2 or 3 turns up and the Ae fed from the top of the coil .. classic top band tuner. Using my HF swr bridge. which actually works fine at 500 and reads the correct power as well , I simply tuned for minimum reflected power. Then thanks to E-bay and others came powers over 100 mW erp and blue lights from the tuner .. At that point, the original coil, now with new pespex spacer's, the ww2 (cellulose ?) spacers having burnt out ... I made a variometer out of a length of brown drain pipe and some marly fittings from b&q , the original coil is now tapped 7 turns up and acts as the feed auto transformer ... this set up works well and will take 200 watts of carrier , latest slight improvement was to tap the capacitor down the coil and tune for minimal reflected power , good swr but requires a re tune if I qsy more than 50% of the band ..may be too higher Q as the tune changes with the wind blowing the wire about ....still use the swr bridge, but take it out before running wspr .. Its not what is in the air ...its what's in/is the ground that matters GL - 73 - G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "tim hague" Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 11:10 AM To: Subject: LF: Antenna Matching > > I'm just about to apply for my 500kHz NoV, I've got around 100W of Tx > power available and I'm looking for some information on antenna matching, > my Tx antenna is just going to be a 132ft Marconi T with a 50ft vertical > section, can I get away with just a series tuned matching cct or are the > voltages across my matching C going to be very high, I have a wide spaced > C approx 200 to 700pF. > > Thanks Tim M0AFJ > >