Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.218]) by air-da06.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINDA063-863e4da846c9165; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:23:21 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7CF703800013D; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:23:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QAiyZ-0001eR-QX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:22:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QAiyZ-0001eI-AI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:22:19 +0100 Received: from nm11-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.244]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QAiyZ-0007uw-6s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:22:19 +0100 Received: from [217.146.183.212] by nm11.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Apr 2011 13:22:13 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.171] by tm5.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Apr 2011 13:22:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1012.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Apr 2011 13:22:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 254580.29707.bm@omp1012.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 50794 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Apr 2011 13:22:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1302873733; bh=+EUrrwssjxgEO/i4WMpOhaLxdnLlp230hZzZX/kJhuc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HJRQzHpWR9dx4dcne8ow0B5jcQ8MWyIJLmrUi7Es0/tAgob7GXiYb/FDkueE1Aa58cIP5ehtK9zKQ3pRp1F0wB+AmXY4m2xIz4fmRqliTZ+i0pP1j33rZYscRFGjbetgJhNmDt8ed3hkKOj1ebzSzHb2FUa27X7fElbiEgh3jng= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F4EgsOa1hYrVtjRI0r9H/H08r+6WkAEhPAURE1sq9wvR0ce5KvazHa1DMx4HqCdUh9vM4KewYb93t4YJXgQ1HnWHsiF9zAN2dmMgQfOd8q2BnwGKFLpjLrtFRV1n6pQ87SGZQzl8hd8UVA4H7t+Hv6Y+23M6qkeSAiKIq3lQhw4=; Message-ID: <79966.50780.qm@web28516.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: c0KMfkYVM1luxglhNBvtKSWR_rOxrUWv4E3XF2VqHblRJVD 943rbWbixGbEmxNmKaHbilCLdfvTOcYP2b8Mnyy3SMXaH38ilKEAkyYiL.RS _GFr0Y5bcxs3kbHhZdtp7oth4rdfzrc77lee64Wn7ktdH6w1DDPcnCn00hOR Mx.BDIFwVIJNFIfP251t6DJT3lFlhMFNMRBH5Yp6qUYdlnkobcHMlww0aIoF DsbwtKLHUNvhA1ZnGH8QZ4QH0E8Uh.g2r0bflhm2BIhi.bo_MKWBiDcDtHGn dfu8E_IwfO7lC0JLVJgH5zl.lyA-- Received: from [194.62.210.50] by web28516.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:22:12 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:22:12 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Osborn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: RE: VLF - vertical probe measurements Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-364779606-1302873732=:50780" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m013.2 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60da4da846c63c5f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-364779606-1302873732=:50780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Stefan / Rik, =A0 Thanks for the response. =A0 I adjust the PA current by varying the drive level=A0to the FET's so the= PA supply voltage stays constant. I should have made that clear. =A0 73 Chris G3XIZ --- On Fri, 15/4/11, Rik Strobbe wrote: From: Rik Strobbe Subject: LF: RE: VLF - vertical probe measurements To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Friday, 15 April, 2011, 14:11 Hello Chris, =A0 maybe a stupid question (wouldn't be my first one): how do you alter the= PA current ? If you change the PA current by changing the=A0PA voltage then the output= power will change more or less with the square of tht PA current (P =3D= UxI and you change both U and I), what would=A0result in a linear behavio= ur between PA current and probe voltage. =A0 73, Rik=A0 ON7YD=A0- OR7T =A0 Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g] namens Chris Osborn [g3xiz@yahoo.co.uk] Verzonden: vrijdag 15 april 2011 14:40 Aan: LF Group Onderwerp: LF: VLF - vertical probe measurements LF, =A0 Acting on advice I have installed a whip aerial (probe)=A0on top of a mast= at the=A0boundary of my property. This is in order to monitor my VLF transmissions and to provide a referenc= e level for any system improvements. =A0 I noticed that the probe's pick-up voltage is directly proportional to=A0m= y PA's supply current. Assuming that the PA efficiency doesn't change drastically with current th= en would I be correct in assuming that the probe's voltage is directly pro= portional to the radiated power? =A0 I was expecting a square law relationship . .=20 =A0 73 Chris G3XIZ --0-364779606-1302873732=:50780 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Stefan / Rik,
 
Thanks for the response.
 
I adjust the PA current by varying the drive level to the FET's= so the PA supply voltage stays constant.
I should have made that clear.
 
73 Chris G3XIZ

--- On Fri, 15/4/11, Rik Strobbe <Rik.= Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be> wrote:

From: Rik Strobbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.= be>
Subject: LF: RE: VLF - vertical probe measurements
To: "rsgb_= lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Fri= day, 15 April, 2011, 14:11

Hello Chris,
 
maybe a stupid question (wouldn't be my= first one): how do you alter the PA current ?
If you change the PA current by changing= the PA voltage then the output power will change more or less with= the square of tht PA current (P =3D UxI and you change both U and I), wha= t would result in a linear behaviour between PA current and probe vol= tage.
 
73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
 <= /DIV>

Van: owner-rsgb_lf_gro= up@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Chris Osborn= [g3xiz@yahoo.co.uk]
Verzonden: vrijdag 15 april 2011 14:40
<= B>Aan: LF Group
Onderwerp: LF: VLF - vertical probe measurem= ents

LF,
 
Acting on advice I have installed a whip aerial (probe) on top= of a mast at the boundary of my property.
This is in order to monitor my VLF transmissions and to provide a ref= erence level for any system improvements.
 
I noticed that the probe's pick-up voltage is directly proportional= to my PA's supply current.
Assuming that the PA efficiency doesn't change drastically with curre= nt then would I be correct in assuming that the probe's voltage is dire= ctly proportional to the radiated power?
 
I was expecting a square law relationship . .
 
73
Chris G3XIZ
--0-364779606-1302873732=:50780--