Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0D2C938000091; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:50:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1StSNU-0007H3-Pa for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:49:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1StSNU-0007Gu-26 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:49:28 +0100 Received: from nm4.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.61]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1StSNR-00061V-Vk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:49:26 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.56] by nm4.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2012 23:49:24 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.227] by tm9.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2012 23:49:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2012 23:49:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 872171.63092.bm@omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 20698 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2012 23:49:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=ip5Dypz9E4o0m5s34RqYSCaTwYrJ4tEQhDyowGssvskw35O1aGsjd9T5mGqpiUf1rAraIOM1rs9nW+4oFKrHpwyVCXl2H49mAUWdz4orF5bMjngsq5qAUozBLTYASJpdJjmRVpW8kh3AMBPoT86ezQZRSadN7cfqH9aDkLkRI/4= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1343087364; bh=aCzTCPm6RpvRkRLZKQsRhgP8MZCz+9Gf9ZmM9PvF73M=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=XtehCwU52uIMaIIjeyiNMBhCgoVMd1hA3BPMVsVDhKXr6Hmsmy7xfOe1nChfZF3mBoxO5c6/++7h2kLU4z4ch4lQVNcezM9kzyUAf0sjzp2GHzSoBA+WbuqiOvDBThw3VAlrvkCPqhPSnmVdPpVEn9TAFrPIPBhKq4TIBx6RboU= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: OLptb8AVM1l4GvE8IU63P4xCaYiX88Jv.atcKNTsm4nLEry W3Xx8A_xRQgKwpfrcvkC_qLaH481VhC7rmnQPw2VDViFwj3JeZPoYt1uhxpu M4xvwTpJKuc3iG2C7sI_4WUWdPHC9wJZ74ysQ4rNcPorTJr_1VZ_SAb4oDb6 dlqKJgGTOu6m4Z1a25RNopn6wJn8.kY28Ob1cbgQXeQBCZM18TYeGp3F.Qza wQd3FRdMTbwairAVv2xEpRpZMqBiHLaim_JsE.k4MAakMVIBIY2tSVN05QM4 VWfYZ9zDWr2mOiOpdStAkBx03oBjIOxAtIEvBfU02R22o1H_Iozg6N4yemnf hI9rtR8DE8_Z7qTWP4wH.BVPvJgKiWMAYRZCRKSfr17Ht1rZBE7HjBWucbUv ugcd1nM3RS8k4Zrv_waeOwmQ7tQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@109.148.227.196 with login) by smtp825.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2012 16:49:24 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <7955E8B83E254BA282A4BF6ECDCFFA18@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:48:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120723-2, 23/07/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, I didnt thinkanything as crude as "chaff"was used in ECM these days :-)) A couple of thoughts..... it was probably dropped from 30000ft altitude 10km. the effective path length for reflection off that would be quite short around the same as VHF and microwave aircraft scatter. This has a rangel limited to arounf 700milesmax (I think some of that isdue to tropo bending too, which is not available at LF [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.61 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 86a33fe05fd4c52b025518dbd249b8c0 Subject: LF: Re: Chaff and LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0102_01CD6936.18221650" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:489745728:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d010.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d405a500de33e4dc8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0102_01CD6936.18221650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Laurence, I didnt thinkanything as crude as "chaff"was used in ECM = these days :-)) A couple of thoughts..... it was probably dropped from 30000ft altitude = 10km. the effective path length for reflection off that would be quite = short around the same as VHF and microwave aircraft scatter. This has a = rangel limited to arounf 700milesmax (I think some of that isdue to = tropo bending too, which is not available at LF=20 The original "chaff" was cut to half wavelengths but that was when radar = was using vhf/uhf. At LF the effect would probably be one of scattering. = I think the cross-section of a jumbo even, at 136khz would be quite = small. Geo effects tend to make man's efforts look a bit puny :-)) Alan ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Laurence KL7UK=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 10:45 PM Subject: LF: Chaff and LF One of the most interesting weather reports this week was from Hawaii = - when a radar image showed a broad swarth of radar returns some 15 = miles long and 1 mile wide gradually moving South with the prevailing = wind. I first thought it was a a weather gust front or rain squal but = the weather chappy says it was from the ongoing military exercises and = they had dropped a large amount of the chaff stuff (radar = sized/reflective) and it was causing the X band radar to show it in = detail.=20 =20 I was pondering - as I sat on the beach on Maui the next day whether = this form of chaff can actually produces anomolies below the frequency = engineered - as a lot of the new type of chaff has to cover a load of = GHz and MHz channelling - if the area is large enough, as this was, and = the drop density of reflective material is large enough whether it would = cause some effects as it appeared to be dropped from 30,000ft or = so...even down to LF...? =20 Another anomoly was seen this morning when I was returning from = Honolulu back to Anchorage - I was approx 1200 miles South of Anchorage = and a Blue glow started to appear - firstly I thought it was just a band = of Green/Blue Auroral light we get fairly often but as we got closer it = was the Notchtilucent clouds way way above us - banded, stripes and = globs of thin cloud being illuminated by the sun which was way below our = horizon and actually not even a pre glow. Now - this isnt a normal radio = thing either but on reading up on these clouds it appears they too are = radio reflective up to a point given the ions that attach to the = nulceous and given they appear to be sub-polar or polar, and mostly a = summer thing, when the temps are coldest at that altitude Im wondering = if some of the oddities we see on MF and HF are caused by these clouds = too... =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0102_01CD6936.18221650 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Laurence, I didnt thinkanything as crude as = "chaff"was=20 used in ECM these days :-))
A couple of thoughts..... it was probably = dropped from=20 30000ft altitude 10km. the effective path length for reflection off that = would=20 be quite short around the same as VHF and microwave aircraft scatter. = This has a=20 rangel limited to arounf 700milesmax (I think some of that isdue to = tropo=20 bending too, which is not available at LF 
 
The original "chaff" was cut to half wavelengths = but that=20 was when radar was using vhf/uhf. At LF the effect would probably = be one of=20 scattering. I think the cross-section of a jumbo even, at 136khz would = be quite=20 small. Geo effects tend to make man's efforts look a bit puny = :-))
 
Alan
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Laurence KL7UK =
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 = 10:45=20 PM
Subject: LF: Chaff and LF


One of the most interesting weather reports this = week was=20 from Hawaii - when a radar image showed a broad swarth of radar = returns some=20 15 miles long and 1 mile wide gradually moving South with the = prevailing wind.=20 I first thought it was a a weather gust front or rain squal but the = weather=20 chappy says it was from the ongoing military exercises and they had = dropped a=20 large amount of the chaff stuff (radar sized/reflective) and it = was=20 causing the X band radar to show it in detail.
 
I was = pondering -=20 as I sat on the beach on Maui the next day whether this form of chaff = can=20 actually produces anomolies below the frequency engineered - as a lot = of the=20 new type of chaff has to cover a load of GHz and MHz channelling - if = the area=20 is large enough, as this was, and the drop density of reflective = material is=20 large enough whether it would cause some effects as it appeared to be = dropped=20 from 30,000ft or so...even down to LF...?
 
Another anomoly = was=20 seen this morning when I was returning from Honolulu back to Anchorage = - I was=20 approx 1200 miles South of Anchorage and a Blue glow started to appear = -=20 firstly I thought it was just a band of Green/Blue Auroral light we = get fairly=20 often but  as we got closer it was the Notchtilucent clouds way = way above=20 us - banded, stripes and globs of thin cloud being illuminated by the = sun=20 which was way below our horizon and actually not even a pre glow. Now = - this=20 isnt a normal radio thing either but on reading up on these clouds it = appears=20 they too are radio reflective up to a point given the ions that attach = to the=20 nulceous and given they appear to be sub-polar or polar, and mostly a = summer=20 thing, when the temps are coldest at that altitude Im wondering if = some of the=20 oddities we see on MF and HF are caused by these clouds=20 too...
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0102_01CD6936.18221650--