Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0QMMQYA009685 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:22:28 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1efCIn-0006oD-VZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:16:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1efCIn-0006o4-91 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:16:53 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1efCIj-0000vo-Ev for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:16:51 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b21so23872682wme.4 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:16:49 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6qELyXPROeEdEby/Czy2B/d716C55KmLROB9jYIaYkg=; b=rm/jG4gEEtq61IoT1uagT7Sq+SITcM33IUz6CT+tIxT45hZ+1NlEsVTxis0WZdFIXh DrpEDuFJ0RcYxldlZdOEdcV/6VDHwbZlSzvVeHwOR3bZyuhiSkIqb5YaYJ7IqTH+8SF1 c1mEAJr5i2PY7roaEAtiTFF6/ckFceb2usJ8xdrfsFMC/zFK483Ax1WBVdUsiXjodRuh KWmBpngK1k36hYVP/kYYrZCPtsFXqITeGsrAYXSgz8afh9RTAynqS0iTU6faD3EZQteG ZeG/j+iibd1b1Xj0WYkV7OSIKVUH7DwT1yAfPzuDvsL8yAOl6PH88ME3aZPViR8r4gJ9 9nnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6qELyXPROeEdEby/Czy2B/d716C55KmLROB9jYIaYkg=; b=lhTSJANn4o7uOkrvr/cuMY98jyeizH0PrPzY93WdL1X9xIS9pnU6EJoBU/RAScxTt6 dyH3hxBCRTvUNWgSf4dW4buCNxePO1AH26bdIeXeifaWTQtbx4Jp4ka+kSpHngIkkos3 doCH1vfzYeRCoEAUANcizsctRs1Q05oUWZdotipwtYsctJ/rYX/e7OZ9aAZ8LgQjnLWk NiOY7lJIVRQLGK9CE5eQNaYkrd1rPlqXZpaNIFnQ8XYUtVzey/90w1SWa7dUnofM10Nw S6xH0q1UC8wYuUorPRNoR5UK1Vmuiy06Y7EeA5h5fsj6USQYUj4l0AMSdG+ak7tsyE5a zOOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfxu8MVf70ApLwyCUU87pkVCDOoGR3cOEw2siegfIX4Uz6Sjyx7 XFDem5Zi5zUTsOeo94q4+iQT+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226kX3MqVtoZCsp93L8sS5ShMZ3pdcAEX9BjWXjOHRqyh6QB9JytcdwAvGpG8tdcFTWX2h6dtw== X-Received: by 10.28.190.3 with SMTP id o3mr12991587wmf.17.1517005008245; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:16:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 44sm12271723wrv.0.2018.01.26.14.16.46 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:16:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:16:46 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <791320206.20180126221646@gmail.com> To: Tobias DG3LV CC: dead.fets@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <1371247928.20180126134524@gmail.com> <1397698645.2553258.1516983835152.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe7.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> <686847880.20180126193617@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Tobias and everyone else. Thanks for the detailed info, much appreciated. I managed to change the divider again, but this is probably the last time as a pad is lifting. I also put back a 22k resistor for the 10K R16. The new divider one didn't have any output at all, save the tiniest bit of ripple:( So I put back the 10K and output was intermittent and much like before. But I noticed if i touched the divider on its plastic shell the the thing gave a much better output, good square waves, but they would either stop themselves, or if power to the board was removed then re-applied, it wouldn't start. The input was on frequency and strong. But now I could sometimes just hover a finger right above the divider chip and it appeared a capacitive effect would start it. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: Softrock RX divider IC problem, unexpected frequency out Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Tobias and everyone else. Thanks for the detailed info, much appreciated. I managed to change the divider again, but this is probably the last time as a pad is lifting. I also put back a 22k resistor for the 10K R16. The new divider one didn't have any output at all, save the tiniest bit of ripple:( So I put back the 10K and output was intermittent and much like before. But I noticed if i touched the divider on its plastic shell the the thing gave a much better output, good square waves, but they would either stop themselves, or if power to the board was removed then re-applied, it wouldn't start. The input was on frequency and strong. But now I could sometimes just hover a finger right above the divider chip and it appeared a capacitive effect would start it. When it did output clean square waves they too were on frequency. There was a proper 90 degree phase shift. I then put in a 6.8k for R16 and it's better still. Dare I go lower, or is this telling me something I am not hearing?I haven't changed the crystal yet. I don't think the issue is now the oscillator itself, but driving the divider. I am sure Andy is right that a Schmitt trigger buffer would be best, but I didn't really want to start redesigning something I know others have had running 24 hours a day with superb results. I'll upload the oscillator wave form at pin 3 of the divider as it is now. http://www.gatesgarth.com/newR17-to--pin3.jpg Friday, January 26, 2018, 9:33:04 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris ! > The first screenshot shows an un-symmetrical square-wave that will > generate two frequencies to the 1:4 divider and Tayloe-mixer. An FFT of > this signal (R17-to-pin3) should show two peaks and not only one as > expected. A standard frequency counter will show only the arithmetic > mean value of both frequencies, as it is just adding zero-crossings > during gate-time. > The Softrock series 6.x had a different type of I/Q divider that used > three flips-flops. They did not have a problem with such an > un-symmetrical square-wave, as there was an inherent divider by two, > which forced the oscillator signal to be symmetrical to the mixer. > You could try to move the bias-level of Q2 transistor to a voltage where > the output (square-wave) signal of Q2 will be almost symmetrical. > If the oscillator at Q1 is not running smoothly, this is where to look > for variations of C's or R's to make it run stable. > 73 de dg3lv Tobias -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com