Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A7491380000AA; Sun, 6 May 2012 05:34:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SQxqE-0003Wk-Re for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 10:33:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SQxqE-0003Wb-4D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 10:33:22 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SQxqC-0000IM-C0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 10:33:21 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEB42AC832 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 09:33:15 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by cmsout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82F) with ESMTP id 801qeFJhN5920M01; Sun, 06 May 2012 09:33:12 -0000 X-USANET-Routed: 3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus Received: from imap01.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.1] by cmsout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id XID806qeFJhN5758X01; Sun, 06 May 2012 09:33:12 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.1 IN dibene@usa.net imap01.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID806qeFJhN5758X01 Received: from web03.cms.usa.net [165.212.8.203] by imap01.cms.usa.net (ESMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82G) with ESMTP id 087qeFJhm1584M21; Sun, 06 May 2012 09:33:12 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 165.212.8.203 AUTO dibene@usa.net web03.cms.usa.net Received: from 95.247.206.84 [95.247.206.84] by web03.cms.usa.net (USANET web-mailer C8.MAIN.3.83I); Sun, 06 May 2012 09:33:12 -0000 Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 11:33:12 +0200 From: "Alberto di Bene" To: X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (C8.MAIN.3.83I) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <790qeFJGm8768S03.1336296792@web03.cms.usa.net> Z-USANET-MsgId: XID087qeFJhm1584X21 X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Hmm. I do see problems all the time, slow machines,viruses, trojans, > idiosyncrasies. Why in the 21stC are we using an O/S based on DOS. > No problems with SpecLab, I bet Wolf has lots to work round. SpecLab > still does silly things due to Windows O/S. [...] Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [165.212.64.31 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.9 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: Re: LF: Open Sauce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:457200512:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad34fa64599794c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none > Hmm. I do see problems all the time, slow machines,viruses, trojans, = > idiosyncrasies. Why in the 21stC are we using an O/S based on DOS. > No problems with SpecLab, I bet Wolf has lots to work round. SpecLab = > still does silly things due to Windows O/S. You must be a Linux fan.... :-) Knowing almost nothing about Windows.= =2E.. The last version of Windows that was Dos based was Windows 95-98 Starting from Win NT,XP, etc. there is no more an underlying Dos layer...= And Windows 7 is even better. I have on my PC a triple boot, Win XP Pro, 64-bit Windows 7, and a special version of Debian Linux (Sidux). = Each time I boot Linux I can observe, on the very same hardware, how much= = sluggish is its responsivness in the GUI, with respect to Win 7.... IMHO Linux is a great operating systems, as long as you use it for server= s. In that role it is maybe the best. But it won't ever win the desktop war.= =2E. when a window takes the double of the time to open than under Win 7, you = feel compelled to reboot with this last opsys. Oh, BTW, I have also a laptop with only a 64-bit Win 7. This laptop does = not have a RESET button, but I have never felt the lack of it. 73 Alberto I2PHD = =