Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7853 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 17:26:33 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 17:26:33 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 23830 invoked by uid 10001); 6 Jul 2003 17:26:33 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 17:26:33 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19ZDH8-0001jF-3c for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 18:26:10 +0100 Received: from [64.12.136.4] (helo=imo-m01.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19ZDH3-0001j3-Oo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 18:26:05 +0100 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-m01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id l.79.14de99a3 (4238) for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 13:25:32 -0400 (EDT) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <79.14de99a3.2c39b58b@aol.com> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 13:25:31 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ nil Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0tests=NO_REAL_NAMEversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false In a message dated 7/6/03 11:31:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time, captbrian@ukonline.co.uk writes: >> So: is the system directional ? >> Not significantly. The whole array is less than a tenth of a wavelength long, so there is not enough phase delay to achieve much directionality. The design was more about loss reduction than anything else.