Return-Path: Received: from rly-df07.mx.aol.com (rly-df07.mail.aol.com [172.19.156.20]) by air-df02.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDF022-5634924686c36c; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:26:56 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-df07.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDF074-5634924686c36c; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:26:37 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1L2sgt-0004XB-BI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:26:19 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1L2sgs-0004X2-T2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:26:18 +0000 Received: from web86501.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.126] helo=web86528.mail.ird.yahoo.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L2sgs-0007oJ-8L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:26:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 70652 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Nov 2008 19:26:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=dNHYZgaPjSuQGVnHGMfbKo6grBffdRY7DGicsI7v/S6ts9NoyHFmbpR2N2yksh3GMcddNvd6fg/fMEL3RCNbi2xSCVsIPcgdmlAEVNfaylxY+OITVrbyWDQZbIPiV0taaBbQtaoUSWUXQ5vcR55IZWyQX+vqOmyf8wXB2IaO0q4=; X-YMail-OSG: LDNyOaMVM1nPVjH.e19svltZ.QqbjfMqqXd6A6KTVUfS1Y1d93nIGGdK Received: from [212.82.104.39] by web86501.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:26:12 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.247.3 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:26:12 +0000 (GMT) From: ALAN MELIA To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <49246129.3030508@ukonline.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <773788.70125.qm@web86501.mail.ird.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: More on Admittance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Peter I think it more due to the fact that commercial bridges and meters=20= really want to cover the widest range. There is obviously a problem with ser= ial connected reactances when one is very much larger than the other. Then t= he nulls on bridges become shallow and ill defined. If you use a parallel ar= rangement this is not a problem. For most Amateur aerial cases you can get a= way with serial connection because there is not the need for the wide range=20= needed for laboratory equipment.....10^3 compared with maybe 10^6. Alan G3NYK --- On Wed, 19/11/08, Peter Dodd wrote: > From: Peter Dodd > Subject: LF: More on Admittance > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Wednesday, 19 November, 2008, 6:55 PM > Many thanks to those who responded to my question regarding > an=20 > Admittance to Impedance converter. > I have a further question. Since most of the measurements > we make on=20 > antennas and transmission line require the answer in term > of impedance=20 > why are there so many commercial instruments calibrated in > units of=20 > Admittance, particularly at VHF and UHF. I suspect that it > is because it=20 > is easier to make accurate variable bridge standards if > they use a=20 > parallel arrangement; is this true > Regards >=20 > Peter, G3LDO >=20 >=20 > > The best program (as far as I am concerned) is called > Z-Y Converter,=20 > > which was sent to me by Rik Strobbe. > > It came direct because it gave the reflector > indigestion although it=20 > > is only 160KB. > > I was given a General Radio 1602-B Admittance Meter as > a pre Christmas=20 > > present, which is calibrated in millimhos, which I > guess is the same=20 > > as millisiemens.