From: "Roman ." <rw3adb@rambler.ru>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:34:28 +0300
Content-Disposition: inline
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <003001c86ce7$e1cd6a40$0d01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj>
In-Reply-To: <003001c86ce7$e1cd6a40$0d01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj>
Message-Id: <767934060.1203050068.188357108.58604@mcgi55.rambler.ru>
Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


That systems are working with 'ideal' quality CW signal only.
The other famous shareware program CW skimmer in russia is UA9OSV CwGet:
http://www.dxsoft.com/ru/products/cwget/



* John W Gould <jwgould@iee.org> [Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:54:10 -0000]:
> Not sure if this has been mentioned on this group but an interesting
> piece
> of software by Alex, VE3NEA, called CW Skimmer has recently been made
> available, see
> http://www.dxatlas.com/CwSkimmer/
>
> Although the software costs $75 one can download a trial version (30
> days).
> It's interesting to see that whilst away from the shack this evening=20
the
> program correctly identified G3KEV (501.9 at 19:35) and also G0MRF
> (503.0 at
> 19:37).   The callsign picking routine must have been designed for the
> HF
> bands, where the protocol is very mature, so got a bit confused with=20
the
> protocol used on 500kHz and eventually decided that David callsign was
> IO91TK!
>
> It seems to need a reasonable S/N, but could be quite useful if one is
> not
> able to personally monitor the band all of the time.  Have others=20
tried
> it?
>
> 73 John, G3WKL
>
>
>
>

--
Roman ..