Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.143]) by air-dc06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC063-86524cf304207; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:40 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CF20838000353; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PMsge-0003Zc-Dm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:37:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PMsgd-0003ZT-NA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:37:47 +0000 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.159]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PMsgb-0003eI-Nl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:37:47 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3413.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 12C501C00081 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:37:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3413.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 05B0B1C00089 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:37:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.48.136]) by mwinf3413.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id A808F1C00081 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:37:39 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20101129013739688.A808F1C00081@mwinf3413.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <75A69A6CEBAA4731B5F892F19791F376@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <35728.39676.qm@web28106.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <008f01cb8f64$fb207120$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <008f01cb8f64$fb207120$4001a8c0@lark> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:37:38 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101128-1, 28/11/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f4cf3041e7d60 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 UK.....and running down our best assets. Not mention selling the family jewels , or in the case of the government .. polishing them ? G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Alan Melia" Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 1:29 AM To: Subject: Re: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? > > Peter, you can blame the governments of the 1980s they would rather give > entertainment licences to silly little cable TV companies that all went > bust > and were hoovered up by NTL for a song. BT offered to cable the UK with > fibre to the customers premises, if it was allowed to recover the > investment > with an entertainment licence, but all the vested interests cried foul. > They > didnt want competition from BT. So when DSL came along it had to try an > build a data business on copper, using a "stone-age" technology. It doesnt > help being forced by the regulator to sell the whatever bandwith the > back-bedroom Telco want at less that cost....you (or BT subscribers) are > subsidising Virgin, AOL, and the rest. None of the so-called competition > put > their own cables in, or built any exchanges, they just want cheap profits > from the assets, your assets, (the copper) already there. NTL hasnt made a > profit on its cable TV because of the competition from Sky. I am not > actually "out in the country", but I cant get an NTL/Virgin connection > they > wont cable out here, not enough money in it. If you have to have cheap > internet connection, you get just what you pay for. Yet the Taxpayer is > paying 50% of every Railway season ticket cost. > > To say that there is no expertise is rubbish....what do you think all the > trunk cables are? They are not copper. Anyway a lot of the cable > installation "expertise" is bought in. The real experience is required at > the ends and in commissioning. Pulling cable just needs muscle not brains. > Countries that had no infrastructure put fibre in straight away, and their > govenments were farsighted enough to see the benefits of subsidising it. > Its > just another case of short-sighted short termism we are so good at in the > UK.....and running down our best assets. > > Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "M0FMT" > To: > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 12:44 AM > Subject: Re: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? > > > Hi Ken > > Thanks for the "teach in". Tell me why is BT so keen on copper wire it has > nothing but disadvantage.Open Reach must spend millions of pounds trying > to > make it work. And now with these raids on the ducting because of the value > of copper it make even more sense to change over to fibre. However I am > being told it will never happen because on lack of expertise within BT. > These comments come from Open Reach at Liverpool. Have you any idea why > they > don't import some engineering talent? > > 73 petefmt > > I support www.NotSpotTelecom.Com your community Telco / ISP. > > --- On Sun, 28/11/10, Ken wrote: > > > From: Ken > Subject: Re: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Sunday, 28 November, 2010, 20:13 > > > > > > Hello Everyone. > I think you will find that with your line length from the serving exchange > (7km)? the S/N ratio will be poor, a minimum of 10dB is required, my > copper > connection is about 2.7km which is considered to be approaching the limit, > although the tests at the customer NTE showed that 3Mbt/s.should have been > possible. At these line lengths any rf will swamp the DSL signal. I have > discussed this problem at length several time with the people I worked > with > at Adastral Park ( commonly known as BT Labs), both DSL and EMC, the > problem > is compounded if a) you have a long length of overhead drop wire, b) the > number and configuration of any internal extensions, and c) the position > of > the router with respect to the incomming NTE (master socket). If the > dropwire is long, the induced common mode interference will be transformed > into differential mode before it reaches the router, any internal > extension > wiring will increase attenuation, especially if it is a 'star > configuration. > The router should be as close as possible to the incoming NTE. A spectral > analysis of my line revealed that there were no DSL carriers above 500kHz, > hence not being able to use 500kHz, if the router shuts down because a > corrupted incoming signal, it will start a 're-training' sequence with the > DSLAM in the serving exchange, however if either the line or the router is > changed, the exchange equipment will then go though a process of > determining > the best possible data speed of the new configuration, thia can take up to > ten days, if during this time any of the speedtest sites are used > different > data rates will be loged. > > I changed my 1st generation BT Homehub router for an older BT Voyager > 2500, > which improved the situation with the HF bands but not at 500kHz, even > with > high value common mode chokes on everything in sight. The problem was > finally solved by changing over to BT Infinity Fibre To The Cabinet (FTTC) > with copper line length of 400m giving data speeds of 14Mbt/s. > > I hope some of this is both of use and interest you all. > > 73 > Ken > M0KHW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: M0FMT > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 10:08 AM > Subject: Re: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? > > > > > > > Hi Again Graham and LF > > Hmmmmm OK looks like you are in better shape than me. A local station who > has difficulty with his ADSL has put Ferrite clamp on filters on all leads > in and out of the Modem including the power supply lead. He claims (and I > have no reason to doubt him) that this has solved his problems. The modem > is > the new BT Black Box one. I have one of those although much more reliable > and faster it still suffers from my description below. The issue I have > appears not to be Modem related but exchange based. > > I talk to Larry regularly on 4m so next time, if I remember, I will get > the > details of his solution Viz ferrite type and where on the lines he is > fitting them and forward it to you. It may help. > As before good luck with your efforts; what ever success you get please > publish it. Ken M0KHW Luton has an ADSL problem too so several people > would > be interested I am sure. > > 73 es GL petefmt > > I support www.NotSpotTelecom.Com your community Telco / ISP. > > --- On Fri, 26/11/10, Graham wrote: > > > From: Graham > Subject: Re: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Friday, 26 November, 2010, 0:49 > > > > Ok Pete > > This is the new router , as its in the same place as the old one , with > (now) the same filters , the PC is linked with a short network cable , the > rest of the pc's are linked by radio. its the adsl like thats failing > > The edimax router was quite robust , never had a drop out on HF and only > over 200 watts , feed , on 500 would stop the link , this one fails with > 25 > watts on 160 .. the router is off most of the day and night , only on with > the pc , the new router is faster , from 6 (old) meg to 9 med down and > 500k > (old) to 890 k upload , but if it keeps dropping out with no cure then its > not much use for my usage > > G, > > > > > From: M0FMT > Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 12:26 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Graham > > Are you sure the problem is the router? > > 136, 500, 160 and to some extent 80m here are kill the ADSL. Even at very > low powers. If your ADSL is cut during your transmissions only and resumes > at the original speed directly afterwards it may well be the router being > temporarily being knocked out. If however you line stays down for a period > of time say several hours then it is not the router. What you are doing is > putting noise (owing to RF) onto your line which is being picked up at the > exchange DSLAM. The exchange equipment (DSLAM) serving your line will > reduce > data speed to ensure that a connection of sorts is maintained. This speed > can go down to below 80kb/s from which it will not recover without > technical > intervention by BT Open Reach. If it goes down to about 300/500kb/s it may > well recover it's original speed over a period of time BT quote 72 hours > yes > 72 hours (I think this time period is not a technical issue but one to > stall > the punters off). On a good day the recovery period can be > speeded up by turning the router off and disconnecting every thing from > the > line and waiting. This makes a quiet line for the automatic recovery to > work.... on a good day!!! If you don't have enough life left to wait for > BT > to physically do some thing then the best thing is to write to BT HQ in > London to the their CEO (his name and location can be found with a bit of > research) and tell him what you think of his outfit. I know from > experience > he does not like receiving this kind of letter. You may have your ISP as > Joe > Blogs Internet Provider dot Com but in reality it is all provided by BT > they > own the final mile and the exchange ...... legal niceties to one side it > is > a fact. > If you get a good Broad Band data rate of say 4/8mb/s your transmissions > on > LF/MF will only slightly degrade your ADSL but if like me on the end of > 7.5km of copper its only 1/1.5mb/s on a very good day, RF will wipe out > your > ADSL for a week or more. So without a lot of letter writing to BT and > angry > phone calls your ASDL will not return to original speed.. > > To maintain a usable data rate on Broad Band here I can not use 136 or > 500kc/s above a few Milli Watts at TX output about 1 Watt on 160m 80 about > 50Watts and on 60m and above 100Watts (possibly more but not tested yet). > Also the longer you stay on the worst the speed degrades.My guess is with > ADSL2 having a much wider bandwidth the problem for Amateurs will extend > further up the spectrum than shown above. > > Hope you are not in my situation....... Oh and don't believe all this > Fibre > stuff. Open Reach have told me that one reason why Fibre is not being > rolled > out like the Virgin setup is that there are only a few BT people capable > of > working with Fibre. This is the reason why BT is Wedded to copper wire. So > we locally have Internet breakdowns owing to Junkies and the like ripping > the Copper cables out of BT ducting to pay for drugs... Bedfordshire has > had > Internet disconnections for days owing to this phenomenon. So along with > cable theft and the lack of trained staff a proper interference free Broad > Band coverage using fibre in this country is looking particularly bleak. > > Good luck! > > 73 es GL petefmt > > I support www.NotSpotTelecom.Com your community Telco / ISP. > > --- On Thu, 25/11/10, Graham wrote: > > > From: Graham > Subject: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Thursday, 25 November, 2010, 22:06 > > > > Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? > > Just upgraded to ADSL2 with a orange net-gear router/wifi router, now 15 > watts on 160 kills the connection > > router is in the same location as the old edimax , which kept running with > 200 watts on 500 K and 400 on Hf > > ? any RF proof ADSL2 on the market > > > Tnx - G.. > > > > > > > > > > >