Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBONV8ob020862 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 00:31:11 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eTFfh-0005bT-QV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:27:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eTFfh-0005bK-C9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:27:09 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eTFfe-0006og-JK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:27:08 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f140so30075572wmd.2 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 15:27:06 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gu24CXsI1G8MhVnJUkCDGrb3rIwidez9MA844VQhMbI=; b=TiXZE1lYfvHLFbcV9WChCF5Xr+olKlAvj5CMqc8T29JpQ7zH5lh5gioVxNPTgqh1/4 5ciTYsXjJLoM+etv3J9L9bX91hRDYPCp74Sgso0LqdsYnWEkcyH1bQwOwK26P4d6OnLm KEwFYKaPMbtJLTJ07beS7qB6REd0j9idNQ1/A6q8a/mf0VVihaMMLT1iTzHrbqAFyi6n RSa6S+R6VMZ7Ag1su7CChO/PtpEpMIyTfPmiiPqLclQG1CeYUyQ9p3Xy9ps78DV+av96 uK1Zf9VlNY7tlyl4nvICCL+C6idPYHARY4oaaYzT/OZEPq9G+CN47U2MJE3G7YlvzwaL vVEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gu24CXsI1G8MhVnJUkCDGrb3rIwidez9MA844VQhMbI=; b=WFRxfOs9WOdkOBbXrLam3LkmezDw1NjK3SoqUFDbGj6Tt3B+28mrAjXYhH35fbBizh DtOxbA8z3KDaZuNiFfe597aMW8JmONYAwxTllfAluzn2KLx8uJ8DFtcVrNGO4YZDKhBK y3tjVui3NzJY3lNvFYIM0wmyNsg8IVD1fkdmwoYAmrUm5fjyQTSdJlmArWv6LDj8YBgR D7uzMc1S0u6Xf49n69KNPgBBWlDi6ueV6/V2/f73IYtwJmabIWivAysPpCBxPr1KHpF6 luNQ3QpG9h3GTun8jupeIQH/qRP1XlWvDXeRzPT4Ml37DqoWNSmOqOTAt5jjLe4z2TQx gKjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mL2A2M53YIsZlOfc6GugEO0Wh6fSFg1pIpLgTPT5wYSuTh9d2XA svLlFZbN8RORmt/UqER2apX4oWfl X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotiBEranALGR3P/CbCddxPqlYCSLcq0a4/0MulTEKfc7UPPxcES+3Oa9rJXad3ZxHJj+FINYg== X-Received: by 10.28.206.141 with SMTP id e135mr16844120wmg.67.1514158025546; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 15:27:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p13sm28504196wrc.61.2017.12.24.15.27.04 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Dec 2017 15:27:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:27:03 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <752702866.20171224232703@gmail.com> To: N1BUG CC: dead.fets@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <4ffc7958-810a-e4d2-7745-258a58338934@n1bug.com> <5A3AE81B.9010205@posteo.de> <5A3B8FB1.1020403@posteo.de> <7ee833a8-04b4-4712-d927-7eccf37eec14@n1bug.com> <5A3D9BC1.1040609@posteo.de> <6fa587ef-d5b0-6a67-b604-ba94144444f7@n1bug.com> <5A3E77DD.4090908@posteo.de> <103A2C60B87B4930A99ED33442E477AF@StevePC> <792271d9-34bb-3fb1-140c-c322015e2e9b@n1bug.com> <5A3F9D04.90800@posteo.de> <6be50d62-c33c-a781-1138-268803e0b6f1@n1bug.com> <1325698854.20171224230351@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello N1(de)BUG, Thank you, I am flattered, but don't for one moment go thinking I actually know what I am talking about, for God's sake! I am just bouncing thoughts, after thinking what I would try, rightly or wrongly! :) Good luck, I am sure you'll get there..... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello N1(de)BUG, Thank you, I am flattered, but don't for one moment go thinking I actually know what I am talking about, for God's sake! I am just bouncing thoughts, after thinking what I would try, rightly or wrongly! :) Good luck, I am sure you'll get there..... Sunday, December 24, 2017, 11:17:46 PM, you wrote: > I think Chris has some really good ideas here. I did turn a test > with the dummy load at the far end of the coax the other day. The > amp didn't seem quite as happy as with the dummy load in the shack > but almost. I will repeat that test since I have made changes to the > amp since. I would like to see what happens with the dummy load on > the other side of the matching transformer set for 1:1. > Paul N1BUG > On 12/24/2017 06:03 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> >> Hello Andy, >> >> Is there any point in Paul putting his dummy load on the end of his >> 75 odd meters of feeder co-ax outside? And then on the secondary of >> his matching transformer when tapped one to one? In case the co-ax is >> iffy or the impedance matching transfomer's doing something odd? -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com