Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x3JGvHHO014110 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:57:19 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hHWkr-0003mJ-LH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:52:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hHWkn-0003lz-86 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:52:45 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hHWkl-000124-BU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:52:44 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmx.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1555692762; bh=GzWkTxb6UeIFpdNmPWGOHkG6NypA4NjF+P3fhsPnKrY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=F5Qukjwm6VumJSEpmzxoDoLoyN3XNBkB0VLOvymQ14CIIPFubvKzRSrJnvV4umkJD ZRvmXtxWst+p4NcnOmVhHgNXtb8OEMTCSZbMatCNXoy8kyFWviocUZbLPI1p5OlMov UyoNc0JZDjMsBdbF07rlswVFkyoMVCyr+DnkkHl4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from Clemens0811 ([84.163.189.104]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LrNE4-1gpm6Q2cQO-0135vU for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:52:42 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <489912956.1184907.1555532989711.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <489912956.1184907.1555532989711@mail.yahoo.com> <5CB79073.30600@posteo.de> <559808A0C84F4073A94E20E3FE0F6863@Clemens0811> <5CB9F666.4090402@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5CB9F666.4090402@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:52:41 +0200 Message-ID: <739A32578B214D0A997621860890F3C3@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdT2zMF0eYJ7W7wzTfm0Zz9ADiq4/gAAuVJQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:15lmbZ4j5mYYdy+PmsQGXu87Oa1cN3VXayd90E2RYQS/LK0tDCa 0O/43Z3vOxtWv6D1utGLjf6/3QUjl7ChHKEs7aBNEc2mk+JBJRl6u3lnxlmklCJH7Cx9Xms YD7iIV1IQVK+KALSULvZxFgUswdBNlT5RxNb1TMRvBCWjCwIuUkDWMFLhb7qihriE01+UXc K499DjWyZrlk06skAD8vA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:L6VM6Bn+6Bw=:HuRampOHMwTm50FYfnkrF/ KkKOk2rnI1j/AF74BtwGo++v8WY/WIX+L6OhPJFju2c9aPZcKwLJtlU9bPX8I0UeaIVbQVfgS FlWtG27DAUlz9qH8Xw4Xm2sYjnmzl/9hwcgy60YUGNvRjxFsTrTMqW5BDtpBF3w9u2DoUSZyx Mp496jm/UGqprgbydXz073stSMJfPNlBcHxUrfkF6zJRO6X7dNjzxZQ86RLFT6/wHDuAe5C// Yjsb+gtbaZyFAoOFP77Z1owquKVN0ogKv9tLjdm3tWetCYuXHhWZ9x9AakQZw/Gq6Ywvx7q4P C6Gjj8HZrF5vm6KmfUMaWn2ke0NYAiXaRs2G/mCETGzn6SnhMtE5vhGbASm1GbZXNms4yhQub 4x2ZYmYiMFRAB82OpmCqcWIQogsuy0QCkZgRig84XJ7E6kPq0/v082VokE7AoZ1eCJSV+cgNM XM+ujqxAgenvBXEhIJH+a1y1lF0W+fH18qSRjFnGL7VRusu+G//ceRZguhBt5TeYd4pdxMwyy Yv4ukhHKQ1SYW1rZj64O7w1a0oQLG6CmMsqBJMgcO8Xtbo+3HKng3N4sfuW9hO7aHj7qTfR0J bX/tDmLNHE1XIMzSG0iEg+57jn9rgeaKg1w0n/UDBdxHIZwiiWWLRxkr0sT99pK+30sKAExlz 0ZRfxheNGnkXgFimtj9bRLyv6oSdX62II4niGO6X41cLK/b0LSrpV5sspvmkHSJjsRmj/o6sD QV3ruDr6hZFmXPQnSEIdKXgwK8n0zGqwvCGL3B1PoUcZl39oiIUET3CxbjBesY/rgTTEkitT9 3PlipASbvVVYdf113oUkCcZNxg/dVsKA6d/otDn36oEwVs63QAmfWevJKrF8LbSeZoTtW7itf 0DdOizJV/aH7PyWS+upH7bpTloYyitR6g36cutJ16+KuK5JnO00OfgTBvbUhCn X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, thanks for the explanation. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-Scan-Signature: f7f918e40888a44a70dddae14bd6a529 Subject: RE: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x3JGvHHO014110 Hi Stefan, thanks for the explanation. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DK7FC >Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 6:25 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR > >Hi Clemens, > >Yes, indeed. This is because i am running two identical >receivers (using >the same LO) with two orthogonal loops into my tree (/p) and then two >WSPR instances using the same callsign (DK7FC/p). Sometimes >WSPR uploads >all two spots and sometimes just one of them (of course >sometimes there >is a decode at one antenna only). So this is not an anormality. > >73, Stefan > > >Am 19.04.2019 17:16, schrieb Clemens Paul: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> >>> A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik >>> looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ. >>> You know, the complainers ;-) >>> >> There was indeed another multiple decode,albeit on the same >frequency. >> >> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475797 -3 > 0 JN64bw 0.5 DK7FC/P JN49ik 563 >> 334 >> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475797 +1 > 0 JN64bw 0.5 DK7FC/P JN49ik 563 >> 334 >> >> >> 73 >> Clemens >> DL4RAJ >> >> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DK7FC >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:46 PM >>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Subject: Re: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR >>> >>> Hi Markus, >>> >>> A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik >>> looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ. >>> You know, the complainers ;-) >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 17.04.2019 22:29, schrieb Markus Vester: >>> >>> Hi Clemens, >>> >>> the signal from Ric looks perfectly clean at DL0AO, >>> indeed a strong signal but no multiple decodes. >>> >>> 73, Markus >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- >>> Von: Clemens Paul >>> An: rsgb_lf_group >>> >>> Cc: rsgb-lf-group >>> >>> Verschickt: Mi, 17. Apr. 2019 22:13 >>> Betreff: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> IW4DXW is booming in here but unfortunately his signal has a >>> very poor purity,hence the multiple deoces. >>> >>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475802 -7 0 JN64bw 0.5 >>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 >>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475787 -7 0 JN64bw 0.5 >>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 >>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475794 0 0 JN64bw 0.5 >>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 >>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475775 -19 0 JN64bw 0.5 >>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 >>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475791 -6 0 JN64bw 0.5 >>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 >>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475772 -20 0 JN64bw 0.5 >>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 >>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475760 -24 0 JN64bw 0.5 >>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 7 >>> >>> >>> 73 >>> >>> Clemens >>> DL4RAJ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >Virenfrei.>www.avg.com >> >>> >> >> =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >> >>> >>> >> >> > > >--- >Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft. >http://www.avg.com >