Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp75869igb; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 05:14:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.128.226 with SMTP id nr2mr39417039lbb.17.1385903655282; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 05:14:15 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d10si24855016lae.82.2013.12.01.05.14.14 for ; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 05:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vn6pI-0001al-GH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 13:12:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vn6pH-0001ac-UX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 13:12:43 +0000 Received: from omr-d09.mx.aol.com ([205.188.108.133]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vn6pE-0005TK-Dj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 13:12:42 +0000 Received: from mtaout-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.195]) by omr-d09.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 58FA0701A0186 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 08:12:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (95-91-238-155-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.238.155]) by mtaout-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 882B4E000092 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 08:12:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <72E33D2DBF1F4D6D837A1C1B5D6C72F4@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:12:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1385903558; bh=GIxyheYd4NJFVFoq+gwokrY6+MsMRlfvAmHeG+mvPYg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kDmLEnbAqazCry6IsQ/XVejIZ1STBgHJ6Cn1HzLJjE2nrkpTVseNk6mfVX95q0GbL BeZF7QCCQO2IaZ/vX9o9lor9OGa4jm7k1JqGqPt+cNbhZe6zaR52CdIUEXZ33MNdXw 9GbZihP4Rqf02me5+z1retjG7y2V11ORFrf/gZQI= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33c3529b35c322db X-AOL-IP: 95.91.238.155 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Uwe, no luck here so far. The primary reason seems to be a slightly unstable QRM line centered on 8970.3 Hz, probably one of many emitted by the railway line 400 m away (see lower part of grabber window). For me, eg. 0.2 Hz lower would be a clear frequency. But as QSY from your side would imply reparking all the other grabbers, I guess I'll just have to live with it for the time being. Will keep on trying anyway... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.108.133 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 310131a5e532565f108a820138314750 Subject: Re: Re: LF: 8970,022Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01CEEE9F.609373D0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3466 Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CEEE9F.609373D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Uwe,=20 no luck here so far. The primary reason seems to be a slightly unstable = QRM line centered on 8970.3 Hz, probably one of many emitted by the = railway line 400 m away (see lower part of grabber window). For me, eg. = 0.2 Hz lower would be a clear frequency. But as QSY from your side would = imply reparking all the other grabbers, I guess I'll just have to live = with it for the time being. Will keep on trying anyway... Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Markus Vester=20 Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 1:37 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: Re: LF: 8970,022Hz The DARC homepage server and ftp access procedure have recently been = modified. I've restarted the temporary VLF grabber at http://www.df6nm.darc.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm Good luck! 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de=20 Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 12:04 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: Re: LF: 8970,022Hz Hi Markus, Jim, Laurence and Eddie, on the air agn since 1043UTC. it will stay so the coming hours. tomorrow = the same procedure as today.=20 mom it is raining.=20 yes, Markus, it is the same ant and the same pwr (a new DJ 4kW-PA, = output reduced to 500W). and no, I don=92t know what it is at -38mHz. = Paul will know, I guess.what abt ur grabber? new URL? GL Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 29.11.2013 10:16 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: LF: 8970,022Hz -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Wonderful news Uwe I had to abandon the attempt to find you last night as my storage = battery failed. :-(=20 This morning using Solar Power my RX is just up and producing the first = display. I assume you are still on as I have peak at 9870.022Hz. In 424uhz, the = 47uhz window is not ready yet. http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm Now for some battery work down in a cold shed so i can continue after = dark. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 28/11/2013 18:37, uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de wrote:=20 On the air agn. Pse see http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=3D1385658000&b=3D080&s=3Dsp=20 output abt 500Wrms into 300m wire (L shape, tops sloping dwn from 17m = to 10m).=20 GL=20 Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CEEE9F.609373D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Uwe,
 
no luck here so far. The primary = reason seems=20 to be a slightly unstable QRM line centered on 8970.3 Hz, probably = one of=20 many emitted by the railway line 400 m away (see lower part of = grabber=20 window). For me, eg. 0.2 Hz lower = would be a=20 clear frequency. But as QSY from your side would imply reparking = all the=20 other grabbers, I guess I'll just have to live with it for the time = being.=20 Will keep on trying = anyway...
 
Best 73,
Markus = (DF6NM)

Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 1:37 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: Re: LF: 8970,022Hz

The DARC homepage server and ftp access = procedure=20 have recently been modified. I've restarted=20 the temporary VLF grabber at
http://www.df6nm.dar= c.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm
 
Good luck!
73, Markus (DF6NM)
From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de =
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 12:04 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: Re: LF: 8970,022Hz

Hi Markus, Jim, Laurence and Eddie,

on the air agn since 1043UTC. it will stay so the = coming=20 hours. tomorrow the same procedure as today.

mom it is raining.

yes, Markus, it is the same ant and the same pwr = (a new DJ=20 4kW-PA, output reduced to 500W). and no, I don=92t know what it is at = -38mHz. Paul=20 will know, I guess.what abt ur grabber? new=20 URL?

GL
Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv



Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet:=20 29.11.2013 10:16
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: LF: = 8970,022Hz


Wonderful news Uwe

I had to abandon the attempt to find you = last=20 night as my storage battery failed.  = :-(=20

This morning using Solar Power my RX is just up and = producing the=20 first display.

I assume you are still on as I have peak at = 9870.022Hz. In=20 424uhz, the 47uhz window is not ready yet.

 http://www.g3zjo.ta= lktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm

Now=20 for some battery work down in a cold shed  so i can continue after=20 dark.

73 Eddie G3ZJO

On 28/11/2013 18:37, uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de = wrote:=20

On the air agn. Pse see

http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=3D138= 5658000&b=3D080&s=3Dsp=20

output abt 500Wrms into 300m wire (L shape, tops sloping dwn = from 17m=20 to 10m).

GL

Uwe/dj8wx=20 jo43sv


------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CEEE9F.609373D0--